The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 02, 2001, 10:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 662
Send a message via AIM to johnSandlin Send a message via Yahoo to johnSandlin
I thought the NCAA made a great call by having Scott Thornley, Gerry Boudreaux, and Ed Corbett work this game. I thought these guys were in a great flow all night long. They were very consistent from start to finish. WEY to go!!
Any comments or opinions???
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2001, 11:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 962
Send a message via AIM to Tim Roden
Nothing went totally arrie like what happened last year with the crash behind Jim Burr's back. So I say it was a good game. I was blowing my whistle in my living room when they wern't but what game does that not happen. And the replays showed the officials on the court were right most of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2001, 11:31am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Thumbs up Missed a few but......

who the hell does not do that during one of their games? I always look back at my games and I can say 5 things that I did not call very well or could have passed on. If I had less than 5 calls, I had a pretty good game. But even if I miss one call, I am always mad at myself and try to learn from the mistake or ask one of my partners if they saw the same thing that I did?

Look, not one call changed the game. Even though Coach Olson felt Jason Williams fouled out a couple of times, but from what I saw, the falling of his players was incidental at best and if anything was going to be called, it should have been on his players for blocks.

Great officiated game.
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2001, 11:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 962
Send a message via AIM to Tim Roden
Re: Missed a few but......

Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
who the hell does not do that during one of their games? I always look back at my games and I can say 5 things that I did not call very well or could have passed on. If I had less than 5 calls, I had a pretty good game. But even if I miss one call, I am always mad at myself and try to learn from the mistake or ask one of my partners if they saw the same thing that I did?

Look, not one call changed the game. Even though Coach Olson felt Jason Williams fouled out a couple of times, but from what I saw, the falling of his players was incidental at best and if anything was going to be called, it should have been on his players for blocks.

Great officiated game.
Totally agree.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2001, 02:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,217
There was a lot of contact that could have been but wasn't called. Battier didn't get all the charging calls he tried for either. As long as it is consistent, and from my seat it seemed to be, you have to be happy with the officiating. I thought that the defenders were flopping at the first sign of Williams' arm extending.

The one non-call I questioned was the Battier block and save, where he appeared to take out an arm along with the ball. It looked like a clear foul at speed, in a situation where officials will be more inclined to anticipate and go with the foul, and backed up by instant replay which showed more powerful contact than some other fouls that were called. Not that I want or could do that job, or that one missed call in a fast-paced game makes a bad officiating job!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2001, 06:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Did anyone notice the play where a Duke player (I'm not sure which one) set the ball on the floor, walked about three steps and then picked it up and dribbled away? I thought this was travelling, but it was so obvious, and no one called it, so perhaps I'm wrong...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2001, 08:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Did anyone notice the play where a Duke player (I'm not sure which one) set the ball on the floor, walked about three steps and then picked it up and dribbled away? I thought this was travelling, but it was so obvious, and no one called it, so perhaps I'm wrong...
How could that be traveling? It's like I said in the 3 second post. A player has to hold with ball in order to travel, with a couple of exceptions.

1- He can't hold the ball, throw it into the air, run and catch it.

2- He can't be on the floor, put the ball on the floor, get up and pick the ball up.

Those are the only two exceptions that I can think of. Otherwise, he must be holding the ball in order to travel.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 04, 2001, 06:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,217
If that isn't traveling, is it not possibly a double dribble?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 04, 2001, 08:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,051
Don't know about NCAA rules, I don't have my book, but for fed, holding the ball and touching it to the floor is not a dribble. As far as I can tell, unless he dribbled before setting it down, this sounds legal.


There is a great axiom in volleyball that applies sometimes in basketball. Ugly does not mean bad.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 04, 2001, 09:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by Hawks Coach
If that isn't traveling, is it not possibly a double dribble?
No. Putting the ball on the floor doesn't constitute a dribble. It's no different than if he fumbled the ball, walked to it and picked it up.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 04, 2001, 10:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Brian Watson
As far as I can tell, unless he dribbled before setting it down, this sounds legal.
It's illegal to dribble, set, dribble but you're right that's not what happened. Thanks, Brian!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1