2005-2006 NFHS POE

[lukealex]

Originally posted by ChuckElias

Yes, in FED, all direct T's count as team fouls. Additionally, if the coach has been notified of A1's DQ, then the T is applied indirectly to the head coach.

I guess I didn't state the question correctly for what I wanted to know. The player ejected can't be assessed another T, who would get the T? Coach? Bench T?

Gotta be a little more specific here, Alex. They're all written out on page 1 of this thread. Which one is confusing you?

I think I just confused myself with the wording, I was thinking POE described was for a game situation, well it is but now I understand its a subject of interpretation instead of a game situation. I could just be wrong again though, its been a long week

[JRutledge]

Originally posted by lukealex


I guess I didn't state the question correctly for what I wanted to know. The player ejected can't be assessed another T, who would get the T? Coach? Bench T?

Any player T is assessed to the player in question. If that player is on the bench, then you have a T on the player and an indirect T toward the coach because that player is bench personnel.

Originally posted by lukealex
I think I just confused myself with the wording, I was thinking POE described was for a game situation, well it is but now I understand its a subject of interpretation instead of a game situation. I could just be wrong again though, its been a long week

Which POE are you talking about?

Peace

[lukealex]

Which POE are you talking about?

Peace

Originally I thought POE was the same as POI (Point of infraction). Now I realize POE is a specific subject of interpretation (I'm not asking about a specific subject). Thanks for clearing that up.

[lukealex]

Originally posted by bballrob
Actually, POI is Point of Interruption.

Woops, what a week it has been

[ChuckElias]

Originally posted by lukealex
The player ejected can't be assessed another T,

There's your mistake right there. A disqualified player certainly can be assessed a technical foul. It gets charged directly to the player and counts toward the team foul total for the half.

You may be thinking of the NCAA interpretation that tells us not to issue a third T to a head coach who has already received two. (This resulted from the Bobby K/Teddy V incident.)

But in FED, any team member (player, sub, coach) can be assessed a T, even if they're already DQ'd.

BTW, I called you Alex in my previous post, but now I'm wondering if you're Luke. (Give in to the dark side, you knob!) What should I call you?

[lukealex]

Originally posted by ChuckElias

There's your mistake right there. A disqualified player certainly can be assessed a technical foul. It gets charged directly to the player and counts toward the team foul total for the half.

You may be thinking of the NCAA interpretation that tells us not to issue a third T to a head coach who has already received two. (This resulted from the Bobby K/Teddy V incident.)

But in FED, any team member (player, sub, coach) can be assessed a T, even if they're already DQ'd.

I guess I wasn't aware a player could receive a T after they have been ejected, thanks

BTW, I called you Alex in my previous post, but now I'm wondering if you're Luke. (Give in to the dark side, you knob!) What should I call you?

Luke is my name, but I won't call you father

[Jurassic Referee]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by lukealex

Originally posted by ChuckElias

Luke is my name, but I won't call you father

[M&M Guy]

Careful, JR - you don't want to be makin' fun of those dead people again...



PS - Where the hell do find those? And, more importantly, where do you find the time to find them?

[Camron Rust]

Originally posted by Nevadaref


Under the old wording if you fouled to stop the clock, it was an intentional foul, but if we go with the wording in the "clarification" it would be allowed (only resulting in a common foul) as long as a legitimate attempt to play the ball was made. That is a fundamental change in the rules.

This is no change. If they played the ball even with the goal of stopping the clock, it was never an intentional foul.

[rainmaker]

Originally posted by M&M Guy
Careful, JR - you don't want to be makin' fun of those dead people again...



PS - Where the hell do find those? And, more importantly, where do you find the time to find them?

M & M -- They must have put him back in the Happy Valley "Care" Facility this week. When he's in there, he has LOTS of time on his hands!

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally posted by rainmaker
[/B]

M & M -- They must have put him back in the Happy Valley "Care" Facility this week. When he's in there, he has LOTS of time on his hands! [/B][/QUOTE]But I'm planning my escape......

And when I do.......