![]() |
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||||
|
Re: NBA?
Quote:
John, Have you ever watched a USBL game? CBA? Whatever that women's league was that competed with the WNBA? All worse than the NBA. Even assuming that you meant the worst officiated pro basketball league in the US, your statement is still pretty clearly false. Quote:
Quote:
You and I both know that we hear this same thing in our HS games. So do we give HS players preferential treatment? I don't. Do you? I doubt it seriously. So why do you suppose that the NBA refs do it? Did you get a CC on the David Stern memo about keeping Tim Duncan in the game during OT of the playoffs? Oops, I guess the officials didn't get that memo either, b/c Duncan fouled out of that game in Denver. Quote:
Not sure I agree with this. Most of the good NCAA programs go about 9 guys deep on a regular basis, and have 3 or 4 "practice squad" guys who only see mop-up time. NBA teams go 8 or maybe 9. Neither level uses all 12 guys (or even 10) on a regular basis, I don't think. Quote:
They question the refs anyway. They don't need to see somebody foul out. Quote:
It sounds to me as though you just don't like the style of play in the NBA, and assume that it's b/c the refs "let them play" that way. But the NBA's rules are very different in some ways from NCAA/FED and allow players to play that way. The refs just call their ruleset (along with the guideline plays that they are given). You can say they stink if you want, and we can debate the accuracy of their calls. But when you say that the NBA officials are the equivalent of WWE refs who intentionally fail to enforce the rules or intentionally miss plays, then you've gone over the line. JMHO.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
| Bookmarks |
|
|