Wed Apr 06, 2005, 05:39pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
I think it does fall under 2.10e, erroneously counting or canceling a score, at least in NCAA. There's some evidence for this in the rulebook:
Quote:
Appendix III, Section 6. Use of Replay Television Equipment
Officials may use courtside replay equipment, videotape or television monitoring to:
12. Correct an error when a request is made from a player, coach or official. (Note: If the player or coach requests a review under correctable errors 2-10.c, .d or .e, his or her team shall be assessed a timeout if he or she is incorrect, but shall not be assessed a timeout if he or she is correct.)
c. Erroneously counting or canceling a score.
1. Determine if a try for goal is a successful two- or three-point attempt;
|
To me, this says that if an official signals a two-point goal and the coach thinks it was a three, the coach can request that the play be reviewed under 2-10.e. I think that's what the Baylor coach was doing.
|
You're saying this is the case in college, right? I'm sure that's not correct in high school.
|
Hybrid Mode
