Who's gonna win? - Page 2

BktBallRef · #16 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 09:34pm

Thanks Rev. Didn't have time to look it up.

ChuckElias · #17 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 09:37pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Daryl H. Long
Shot clock violation: Throwin should have been on sideline.
See rules: 9-11, 9-15, 7-5-1

I don't have my book here Daryl, but are you saying that the throw-in should be on the sideline even if the player's foot was inside the FT circle?

ChuckElias · #18 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 09:39pm

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
How about the no call on May's layup? Charge or flop?

That was a tough one. My first gut reaction was "Offense", but seeing it again, I can see why the Lead let it go. Looked like the defender may have already been moving backwards (which really shouldn't matter) and was pretty nearly under the basket.

BktBallRef · #19 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 09:39pm

It wasn't inside the FT circle, Chuck.

Snake~eyes · #20 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 10:07pm

5 touch fouls

5th foul looked like a pretty big push to me...

JRutledge · #21 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 10:12pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Snake~eyes
5 touch fouls

5th foul looked like a pretty big push to me...

I think Packer's point was that his fouls were not good fouls on Augustine's part. The fouls were basically lazy. I can honestly say I do not think he was being critical of the officials. He was stating that Augustine has to be smarter than those plays.

Peace

BktBallRef · #22 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 10:16pm

I don't understand why Williams keeps coming out of the zone. Man to man ain't gettin' it.

[Edited by BktBallRef on Apr 4th, 2005 at 11:19 PM]

Snake~eyes · #23 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 10:21pm

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge

Quote:

Originally posted by Snake~eyes
5 touch fouls

5th foul looked like a pretty big push to me...

I think Packer's point was that his fouls were not good fouls on Augustine's part. The fouls were basically lazy. I can honestly say I do not think he was being critical of the officials. He was stating that Augustine has to be smarter than those plays.

No way.. I think he was clearly saying the fouls were touch fouls and should not have been called. He even stated that the 5th call was a touch foul.

JRutledge · #24 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 10:24pm

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
I don't understand why Williams keeps coming out of the zone. Man to man ain't gettin' it.

I don't either. Illinois is not attacking the zone. Why come out of it.

Peace

BktBallRef · #25 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 10:28pm

Yes.

ChuckElias · #26 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 10:29pm

I told you so.

JRutledge · #27 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 10:30pm

It was a classic.

Peace

Snake~eyes · #28 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 10:30pm

So since I picked the winner, doesn't this mean I win the bracket contest for this forum?

Mark Dexter · #29 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 10:39pm

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef

-Shot clock violation by Illnois with 3.9 seconds to go in the half. The ball is beyond the 3 point arc at the top of the key when the clock expires. Why was the throw-in from the baseline?

Definately saw that, too.

brainbrian · #30 (**permalink**) Mon Apr 04, 2005, 10:40pm

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge

Quote:

Originally posted by Snake~eyes
5 touch fouls

5th foul looked like a pretty big push to me...

I think Packer's point was that his fouls were not good fouls on Augustine's part. The fouls were basically lazy. I can honestly say I do not think he was being critical of the officials. He was stating that Augustine has to be smarter than those plays.

Peace

I believe Packer even went on to say that Augistine's fouls were just caused by him not wanting to move his feet and not getting to the spot.