|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
I was rooting for the Angels and Orlando Cabrera. Now I've got the Clemens-laden Astro's (a team I otherwise love) and the Carl Everett-laden White Sox (a team to which I am otherwise indifferent).
So do I root for a team that I really like, but is led by a traitor and a former Yankee great (Pettit); or do I root for a team that I couldn't care less about, except for one completely self-absorbed, unprofessional dope that I can't stand?
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
Quote:
Isn't the Astros' shortstop, Adam Everett, the player the Sox traded for Carl Everett? And how can we forget the Bagwell for Larry Anderson fiasco. I guess I will have to root for the Astros anyway because of Biggio and Bagwell. |
|
|||
Quote:
Don't talk to me about Larry Anderson.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
Quote:
Oh wait...that would be me that doesn't want to hear about that trade...never mind. |
|
|||
Chuck, how do you like my new signature?
Still looking for the Gaffanino line. Would you happen to have it?
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
Couple of pretty good games so far, don't you think? I almost stayed awake for last night's ending. I have to wonder if Lidge can shake off this home run as easily as he seemed to shake off the big homer he gave up in the NLCS.
Suddenly everybody's talking sweep, but isn't the home team supposed to win the first two games? So we're not even going to wait to see what happens when the the Astros get home with Oswalt on the mound? Seems pretty foolish to me. I remember the Yankees lost the first two to the Dodgers in 78 and then won the series. The Dodgers then returned the favor by losing the first two to the Yankees -- in 81? -- and then winning the series. In '96, the Yanks lost the first two at home and then won the next four to beat the Braves. Anyway, I'm enjoying it, even if it isn't the high profile match-up that some people would prefer.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
Ok, so the Bud Light and Mrs Selig comment broght me to this:
What's the deal with MLB telling the Astros they have to play with the roof open tonight? I can see them telling the team to close it in the event of inclement weather, say for safety reasons, but what's the purpose of telling them they have to keep it open, other than to negate some of the home-field crowd noise advantage? Sounds like an obvious conspiracy to let the American League win again. It's true...it's true...
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
couple of good games except for???
a couple calls either way, that i think should be REVIEWABLE BY THE MONITOR, and just so happens it cost the Astros! another ploy to let the american league win again!! I think the umps have had a rough post season, they have missed some key plays in some key situations, i know you can miss some things, but man have they struggled lately, more than ever!!
__________________
DETERMINATION ALL BUT ERASES THE THIN LINE BETWEEN THE IMPOSSIBLE AND THE POSSIBLE! |
|
|||
Quote:
Voila...... the dome MUST be opened! PS- Little known fact.....Steve Bartman was an undercover operative for TDOARSTHNPSITLEIMSWTGPL. It's true, it's true...... [Edited by Jurassic Referee on Oct 25th, 2005 at 03:34 PM] |
Bookmarks |
|
|