The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 08:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,104
http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/3430088

Refs get it wrong way too much
Charley Rosen / Special to FOXSports.com
Posted: 14 hours ago

Referees are a necessary evil.

Back when Ed T. Rush was the league's director of officiating, he told me that the game videos prove that the calls made by NBA refs are correct 93 percent of the time. These videos were produced by whichever local station (or national network) that had televised the games, and were edited from the footage provided by the four or five cameras normally in use.

However, one particularly wealthy franchise normally records their home games using 12 of their own cameras. According to the enhanced angles provided by these videos, NBA refs actually blow one of every three calls.

And Rush also admitted that nobody in his office tallied or evaluated another critical aspect of officiating that had at least as much of an influence on ball games — the non-calls.

No wonder that the NBA's coaches and players feel they have a license to complain whenever the whistle shrills. The sheer capriciousness of the calls, coupled with the refs' righteous arrogance, is enough to drive coaches batty.

Before the establishment of the National Basketball Developmental League, virtually every player call-up (about 40 every season) was from the Continental Basketball Association. The CBA was also used as the official training ground for future NBA refs — the likes of Steve Javie, Ken Mauer, Gary Benson, Bill Springer, Jim Delaney, Monty McCutchen, Ron Garretson, Duke Callahan, Ronnie Nunn (the NBA's current director of officials), and many more. In fact, Garretson once told me this: "The CBA has only one purpose. To develop officials for the NBA."

During my own nine-year stint in the CBA, I tangled with once and future NBA refs on numerous occasions. I firmly believed that refs were cops with whistles instead of guns. That they were mere mechanics who scanned a game looking for mistakes. No surprise, then, that for each of my six seasons as a head coach (Savannah, 1986-87; Rockford, 1988-90; Oklahoma City, 1990-91; and Albany, 1991-92), I led the CBA in technical fouls.

I deserved many (if not most) of my T's. And just as certainly I was unjustly "whacked" and even "tossed" several times. Like the time I happened to be coaching the Oklahoma City Cavalry and we were getting trounced in Wichita Falls by the hometown Texans. There was a drunk sitting directly behind me, who was loudly excoriating the refs in a thick southern drawl whenever a call went against the Texans. Yet it was I who was booted midway through the second quarter by Callahan. "I've heard enough from you, Charley," Callahan shouted as he pointed offstage right. I was then illegally locked inside the visitors locker room, where I had no other outlet than to throw a few chairs and kick an innocent garbage can around the room.

But it wasn't only my own personal differences with referees that demonstrated how otherwise normal, peaceful, and knowledgeable basketball coaches could be driven to outbreaks of temporary insanity by NBA-bound referees.

Here are a few examples:

I was Phil Jackson's assistant, and roommate, with the Albany Patroons from 1983-86, and after we were convinced that we'd gotten "homered" in a game in Pensacola, neither of us could sleep. By chance we'd discovered that the two officials who had worked the game were not only registered in the same motel, but were also lodged in an adjacent room. Phil's anger was such that roughly every half-hour throughout most of the night he'd loudly bang on the common wall and scream curses at the offending refs. "If we can't sleep," was his rationale, "then they sure don't deserve to sleep either."

The Patroons finished up the 1984-85 season playing the Puerto Rico Coquis in San Juan. The home team was coached by Herb Brown, older brother of Larry, one-time head coach of the Pistons, and currently an assistant in Atlanta. The Coquis needed a win to qualify for the playoffs, and in Brown's view a series of biased calls tilted the game to the Patroons and unjustly terminated his season. Herb was so incensed that he stormed the court, grabbed the whistle-lanyard that was draped around Ken Mauer's neck, and proceeded to twist the lanyard in such a way as to prevent Mauer from breathing. None of the other coaches, or players (or the other ref), made a move to save Mauer from a horrible death. It wasn't until Mauer's face started turning blue that a security officer pulled Brown away. (Brown's penalty was to be suspended without pay for the first six games of the following season.)

And it isn't only the coaches on the short end of a score who are frequently freaked by the refs' incompetence.

George Karl was coaching the Patroons, and my Oklahoma City squad was being thoroughly demolished in the fourth quarter of a game played in Albany. As I recall, we were down by 30 points with about three minutes left in the game, when Karl nevertheless became incensed by a foul called on one of his players. Karl raced on to the court, picked up the bouncing ball, and neatly punted it high into the upper grandstand. A truly monumental feat which deserved a standing ovation, but which earned him an instantaneous banishment.

The late Bill Musselman was certainly the most successful coach in CBA history, with a total of three league championships (1985-88). One of the secrets of Musselman's impressive achievements was his ability to locate and hire (for illegally inflated wages) ex-NBA players for spot service. Like Coby Deitrick, who was around long enough to throw a terrific pass to beat the Patroons in a crucial playoff game. Or Rod Higgins, who played in only the seventh game of another playoff series against the Patroons and scored 30-plus points. But in addition to being an outstanding Xs-and-Os coach and a resourceful recruiter, Muss was also blessed with a highly developed sense of fair play.

Like the time his Tampa Bay Thrillers beat my Savannah Spirits on a last-second jumper by the late "Fast" Eddie Johnson. Despite the dramatic win on his home court, Muss was bothered by the fact that one particular ref had called three offensive fouls on my best player (Cedric Henderson) during the last few minutes of the game. Instead of celebrating the victory, Muss followed the refs to their dressing room, and began to kick and bang on the door. "You stole the game from Charley!" he kept shouting. "You stole the game!"

With one last ferocious kick, he then stormed off to deliver who-knows-what kind of postgame summation to his players.

Ladies, don't raise your sons to be cowboys or referees.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 09:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 1,023
You know what? I used to have roughly the same opinion (though not as strong, because I never coached).

Then I tried doing this. And I met other people who do this. And it totally changed my perspective.

And I think we can all agree that Charley Rosen is a bitter old man.
__________________
"And I'm not just some fan, I've refereed football and basketball in addition to all the baseball I've umpired. I've never made a call that horrible in my life in any sport."---Greatest. Official. Ever.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 09:22am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,688
Quote:
Originally posted by OverAndBack
You know what? I used to have roughly the same opinion (though not as strong, because I never coached).

Then I tried doing this. And I met other people who do this. And it totally changed my perspective.

And I think we can all agree that Charley Rosen is a bitter old man.
It's too bad, too. Some people can say "I am a has-been." This guy would have to say "I am a never-was."

--Rich
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 09:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,910
First of all, I'm somewhat suprised an article like that was published. What bearing does it have on now? His complaints are from his coaching days. The second thing he should think about is what level of play he was coaching. Professional basketball, in my opinion, is not about the game, its about entertainment. No offense to those that work it, I have all kinds of respect for the game management skills they use nightly, but I think the league wants the game called as entertainment rather than a legitimate athletic contest. It is interesting though, Rosen doesn't talk about the players he couldn't convince to play defense, rebound or any of the other things that win basketball games. Maybe we should get to write a rebuttal about all of the stupid coaching mistakes we see in a season, like coaching the officials instead of his team?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 10:07am
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Are officials wrong on a significant percent of calls?
I would say definitely yes. What percent? It depends on who did the research. The bottom line is this is as good as it gets, so officiating must be accepted with all its imperfection because there simply is no alternative. It's like complaining about the weather. If it bothers you that much you need to stay inside.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 11:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 88
Why don't they play a few games without ref's. I would love to watch the fans, coaches and commentators react when the players call their own fouls.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 11:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally posted by just another ref
Are officials wrong on a significant percent of calls?
I would say definitely yes. What percent? It depends on who did the research. The bottom line is this is as good as it gets, so officiating must be accepted with all its imperfection because there simply is no alternative. It's like complaining about the weather. If it bothers you that much you need to stay inside.
I've always thought about it as being like field conditions. A poorly-maintained baseball field produces more bad hops, more randomness. The players and coaches have to deal with it and accept it. But if a given field is consistently in bad shape, they have a right to complain to the grounds crew to do something about it.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 11:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Palmyra, VA
Posts: 245
Send a message via AIM to drothamel
Jeff-

Field conditions are physical. They can be changed instantly and remain constant. Officiating has a human judgement element that cannot be definitely measured all of the time. If a mound is two inches too low, it is two inches too low. Ask three officials about a collision between two players, and you could easily get three different answers.
__________________
-RESPECT THE GAME-
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 11:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,910
What a moronic article. The fact that he seems almost proud of childish acts like waking up the officials ever half-hour reflects even more on what an idiot he is.

Z
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 12:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 572
I think I've solved this. Get the referees a chair near the coach. Evidently every play can be seen perfectly from these angles. Why are we wasting time running up and down the court??
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 12:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,612
Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman
What a moronic article.
Agreed. After the first few paragraphs, I gave it up.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 01:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 52
I think it's safe to say that Rosen's comments are not only biased but pretty much over the top. But anyone who has officiated for any period of time has worked with, met or knows of officials that "fit the profile". The fatal flaw in the artical is the premise that all officials fall into this stereotype. There are guys I won't ever work with again because they belive it unimaginable that they could make a mistake and that coaches should always be seen at best as insignificant and at worst incompetant advisaries. It's been my experience that the vast majority of officials study hard, work hard and want to do the best job they possibly can. I've always said everyone that coaches should have to officiate and everyone that officiates should have to coach-it does give you a completly different perspective.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 01:07pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,557
Thumbs up

No matter how the officiating goes, you're going to have these points of view. It's not a bad thing.

Anyone ever read Dick Irvin's, "Tough Calls"?
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 01:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 323
oh boo hooo
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 04, 2005, 01:29pm
Ref Ump Welsch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink

Does Mr. Rosen need a hemlock laced tissue?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1