The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 02, 2005, 11:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 572
I went through the NF case book, and could not find any guidelines on how to handle timing mistakes, e.i. clock started too soon, or too late, or not at all. Outside of rule 5-10 (definite knowledge of time, etc.), it would be helpful if the NF could give us guidelines on how to handle these situations. Timers are human also, and mistakes can and will occur. In equity, there should be a procedure that is consistant.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 02, 2005, 12:08pm
M.A.S.H.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
There are some in 5.10.1/2
However I agree, should make it clear. POE?!?!?!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 02, 2005, 03:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 127
A crew from my group had a situation this year where the timer said he accidently let 4 seconds run off of the clock after a violation. (The clock showed 45 seconds remaining) None of the 3 officials saw it happen, but the R made the decision that the clock operator was part of the crew....so after a brief discussion, the officials decided to put the time back on the clock.
Some in my association said that should not have been done becasue the rule book says that the referee must have "definite information". ......others argued that this allows potential for "home cooking".
The bottom line is that the case book says that the clock operator and score keeper may be used by the referee to gain definite knowledge in cases such as this......

Just curious as to how many would add time back based on the clock operator??? I'm not sure that I would...I guess it depends on the circumstances.
__________________
Refiator
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 02, 2005, 05:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 58
I agree, they should define what an acceptable source for that definite information would be.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1