|
|||
With three seconds on the clock and a two point game, Team A is dribbiling down for a last second shot. A1 pulls up, behind the three point line, and shoots. A1 realese the ball, then horn sounds. As the horn sounds A1 is fouled. The referee calls the foul. The shot missed and A1 is awarded three free throws. A1 shoots two free throws and Team B requests a timeout prior to the third throw.
Is Team B allowed to take the timeout with NO time on the clock. Is this considered in between regulation and overtime, or is this still considered regulation. Thoughts please. |
|
|||
It's still regulation. The quarter doesn't end until the last FT is shot.
I'm assuming A1 made one or both of the first two FTs. Otherwise A has no chance to win and the game is over. Award B the timeout. However, B cannot call consecutive timeouts once time has expired. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups |
|
|||
What's interesting about this is the follows:
The governing body for amateur basketball in Ontario is called Basketball Ontario. Every year, many centres host "sanctioned tournaments" which count towards Basketball Ontario standings and rankings. At the end of the basketball season, teams play in the Provincial finals, organized by the host city and Basketball Ontario. The format for these sanctioned tournaments is a round-robin followed by single knockout. To break ties in the round-robin, points for and/or against are used. So, in the round-robin games, we actually have a tournament rule that all foul shots are to be taken, regardless if the win is already decided. The reason is that it may affect a team's points +/-.
__________________
Pope Francis |
Bookmarks |
|
|