The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 03, 2005, 08:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 19
Re: Maybe it's just me

Quote:
Originally posted by eventnyc
The bump caused a violation which (should have) prevented "normal offensive maneuvers". So, it's a foul, even thought the same bump elsewhere on the court might not have been a foul.
Exactly!
__________________
Scott Sanders
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 03, 2005, 08:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 108
Send a message via AIM to chayce
I wanted to first comment on the advantage/disadvantage discussion and mention that at two of the camps I went to over the summer found a little different terminology. In NCAA Women's, the ad/dis is being replaced by impact/nonimpact. At first it seemed a bit nitpicky to me and that both sets of terminology are the same. After an explanation by Barb Jacobs (Big East and NCAA Rules Committee), I could finally see the difference. She said, "A player could gain an advantage over her opponent away from the ball and still there could be no impact on the play." True...anyway, give it some thought and see what you think.

Second, I also agree with many of you that when you have lines involved, you have to call what everyone else in the arena can obviously see. If the kid touched the division line, it was over and back. If he/she touched it because of the foul, call the foul. I had a situation this year where I passed on something and it snowballed into a mess. Here is the situation:

Tie game. 2 Minutes remaining. A1 drives to basket from wing (in front of me at C). B1 sets up to take the charge. A1 does a jump stop right in front of B1. B1 flops. I pass on T for flop. The flop then causes A1 to walk. In that split second, I decide that because I passed on the flop, I had to also pass on the walk! Ouch. A1 scores and A ends up winning by three. Coach A now thinks I missed a charge and a walk! The point I am making is that when we start trying to "keep score" with how many times we have passed on a call, we are headed for trouble. In this case, I should have just called the T for the flop! That would have been a very tough and unpopular call in a heated, rivalry game but that is what I was being paid for. It is the only time in the last five years where I have to admit to a "make-up" call but that is in essence what I did and I hope I never do it again!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 03, 2005, 08:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 108
Send a message via AIM to chayce
That should read Coach B thought I missed a charge and a walk!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 03, 2005, 08:43pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by chayce
I wanted to first comment on the advantage/disadvantage discussion and mention that at two of the camps I went to over the summer found a little different terminology. In NCAA Women's, the ad/dis is being replaced by impact/nonimpact. At first it seemed a bit nitpicky to me and that both sets of terminology are the same. After an explanation by Barb Jacobs (Big East and NCAA Rules Committee), I could finally see the difference. She said, "A player could gain an advantage over her opponent away from the ball and still there could be no impact on the play." True...anyway, give it some thought and see what you think.

I think that absolutely nothing has changed in the philosophy in the last 45 years. All that has been changed is the terminology. Every few years, some pointy-headed clinician decides that his/her ticket to the Basketball Hall of Fame is to come up with some new amazing officiating concept. To do that, they take sumthin' like the good ol' advantage/disadvantage theory and try to describe it in completely different words( even though it is the same old theory). The latest one happens to be impact/non-impact, I guess. Personally, I think that the biggest problem with these philosophies is that people are trying to drill them into the heads of newer officials who are still trying to learn "what" to call, let alone "why" anything should or should not be called. Gotta learn to walk before you can run, imo.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 04, 2005, 12:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24
In Ohio, we do not work in crews so every night you're working with a different partner. But no matter who you work with, there's always one common philosophy, "Call the obvious".

In this situation you've gotta call the foul. If the bump caused the player to step out of bounds, you'd call the foul, right?

The coach has no arguement! The bump caused the violation.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1