The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 03, 2005, 08:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21
I flipped over and saw some of the Duke game and when i did they were viewing a loose ball scramble on the video monitor with over 5 minutes left to see if a punch was thrown. I don't know the rules for NCAA I thought I saw on here earlier that you can't view the screen except for last second shots. Could someone please explain.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 03, 2005, 08:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 377
I've seen them use the screen to review a fight. I thought Ewing threw a little elbow in the scrum. Don't know why Chris Paul got the T. I guess they were trying to be balanced.
__________________
Luther
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 03, 2005, 08:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by lrpalmer3
I've seen them use the screen to review a fight. I thought Ewing threw a little elbow in the scrum. Don't know why Chris Paul got the T. I guess they were trying to be balanced.
The technicals were for the vereiage, not the contact. Paul can run his mouth with the best of them.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 03, 2005, 09:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
BR-160 APPENDIX III OFFICIATING GUIDELINES
Section 6. Use of Replay Television Equipment

...
4. Determine if a fight occurred, the individuals who participated and bench personnel who left the bench area.


That's the exact clip from the rules book.

Now, the punctuation could be better because it seems unclear whether this is a monitor situation or not. Does the rule mean that you can go to the monitor to determine 1. IF A FIGHT OCCURRED 2. the individuals who participated, and 3. the bench personnel who left the bench OR does it mean if a fight occurred (a judgement that they have to make on their own) the officials can then use the monitor to determine 1. the individuals who participated, and 2. who left the benches.
Without better punctuation and sentence structure, I can't tell.
I do know that the NCAA has been cracking down on monitor use though.
It even issued a bulletin that said:

Officials shall not use a courtside monitor or courtside video tape for judgment calls such as:
a. Who committed a foul.
b. Basket interference.
c. Goal tending.
d. The release of the ball before the activation of the red light or red lights (Exception:
Rule 2-5.2.a & .b)
e. The release of the ball before the sounding of the shot clock horn (Exception: Rule 2-5.2.c&.d).
Note: Some officials seem to be developing a dependency on the use of the monitor when it is not permissible by the rules. When dealing with the human factor, mistakes are made. Human judgment is an important element of the game. To “err is human,” and a fear of committing a mistake should not foster an illegal dependency.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 03, 2005, 10:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 337
Could this be a new POE for NCAA officials? I've seen three occasions this season where the monitor was used to determine whether a punch was thrown. The first was a Big East game, I think. After a long review delay - several minutes - they ejected the player.
__________________
If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to be a horrible warning.

- Catherine Aird
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1