|
I don't get your point...it was clearly established in the original & subsequent post that the ball was tapped by B1, touched A1, then went into backcourt where it was first touched again by A. All 3 elements of backcourt violation are present...team control, last touched, first touched. My post was in response to that's a walk's misunderstanding of when team control ends - had nothing to do with who touched it where.....that was already a given. [/QUOTE]
My point was to make sure no one got confused about what you were saying. What you were saying is exactly true that team control was not lost when B touched it, but I wanted to make sure they understood that you were not saying that if B touched it last than A could not go get it.
In short just adding onto your statement as you were to Smitty. Sorry for the confussion.
__________________
You can do what you want to do and be what you want to be but you can't be afraid to pay the price!
|
Mon Jan 31, 2005, 02:30pm
Hybrid Mode
