Mon Jan 10, 2005, 06:41pm
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,187
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Snaqwells
Quote:
Originally posted by blindzebra
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Somebody, anybody:
Please tell BZ to take a Valium and go back and read my posts in this thread.
MTD, Sr.
BZ:
Go back and read your first post. You made a statement that was not correct. Now read the rest of my posts. I have answered your question like I said I would and gave you an example of an intentional foul where no contact is involved. Of course the intentional foul has to be a technical foul if no contact is involved. But read your first post, you stated, and I quote you once again: "An intentional foul may or may not be a technical foul, but is ALWAYS a contact foul, 4-19-3." That is not a true statement.
MTD, Sr.
|
Let's also re-read 4-19-3. The first 9 words are interesting.
An intentional foul is a PERSONAL or technical foul...
Now let's look at 4-19-1, a PERSONAL foul is a player foul which involves illegal CONTACT.
That sure seems to say that an intentional foul NEEDS to have contact.
|
No, it doesn't by the definitions you just gave. It leaves open the possibility of a Intentional Technical foul, which does not have to involve contact.
|
Snaqwells:
Your go to the head of the class for your astute observation. That is why Rule 4 is the most important rule in both the NFHS and NCAA rules books.
MTD, Sr.
[Edited by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. on Jan 10th, 2005 at 06:53 PM]
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
|
Threaded Mode
