The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   shooter for technical foul (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/17448-shooter-technical-foul.html)

shont Fri Jan 07, 2005 03:03pm
Can two different players shoot the free throws for a technical foul? ie, A1 shoots first throw and misses so coach puts A2 at the line to shoot 2nd throw. How about A1 shoots first throw and misses so coach subs A6 in to shoot 2nd throw?

thaanks

shont

gordon30307 Fri Jan 07, 2005 03:05pm
Quote:
Originally posted by shont
Can two different players shoot the free throws for a technical foul? ie, A1 shoots first throw and misses so coach puts A2 at the line to shoot 2nd throw. How about A1 shoots first throw and misses so coach subs A6 in to shoot 2nd throw?

thaanks

shont
yes

rockyroad Fri Jan 07, 2005 03:47pm
Quote:
Originally posted by gordon30307
Quote:
Originally posted by shont
Can two different players shoot the free throws for a technical foul? ie, A1 shoots first throw and misses so coach puts A2 at the line to shoot 2nd throw. How about A1 shoots first throw and misses so coach subs A6 in to shoot 2nd throw?

thaanks

shont
yes
In Fed games...but not in NCAA games - same shooter shoots both in NCAA games...

Mark Padgett Fri Jan 07, 2005 05:16pm
Quote:
Originally posted by BushRef
GOt a rule reference?
NF 8-3. Attempting Technical-Foul Free Throws

.....The coach or captain shall designate the free
thrower(s).

The fact that it says "thrower(s)" indicates there can be more than one during the two free throws.

However, no more than one player can attempt a single free throw. ;)

rainmaker Fri Jan 07, 2005 06:26pm
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett


However, no more than one player can attempt a single free throw. ;)
That's just your interp, Mark. I don't see anything in the Fed book that prevents it so it must be legal. You and Bruce may call the shots for the TBA, but out here in NFHS-land, we have the Lord High Rules Committee, and that's who we submit to. Look on their website. Do you see any interp or memo that prevents more than one player from attempting a single free throw? Of course not. Because they never intended to make it illegal. I mean, let's use some common sense here, what rule fundamental is violated by letting more than one player attempt a single free throw? You're just being overly officious if you try to make this rule hold up. Let 'em play, I say! Try not to interrupt the flow of the game. Don't be so over-controlling!

Mark Padgett Fri Jan 07, 2005 06:34pm
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett


However, no more than one player can attempt a single free throw. ;)
That's just your interp, Mark. I don't see anything in the Fed book that prevents it so it must be legal. You and Bruce may call the shots for the TBA, but out here in NFHS-land, we have the Lord High Rules Committee, and that's who we submit to. Look on their website. Do you see any interp or memo that prevents more than one player from attempting a single free throw? Of course not. Because they never intended to make it illegal. I mean, let's use some common sense here, what rule fundamental is violated by letting more than one player attempt a single free throw? You're just being overly officious if you try to make this rule hold up. Let 'em play, I say! Try not to interrupt the flow of the game. Don't be so over-controlling!
Juulie - you must be really bored.

rainmaker Fri Jan 07, 2005 06:45pm
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett


However, no more than one player can attempt a single free throw. ;)
That's just your interp, Mark. I don't see anything in the Fed book that prevents it so it must be legal. You and Bruce may call the shots for the TBA, but out here in NFHS-land, we have the Lord High Rules Committee, and that's who we submit to. Look on their website. Do you see any interp or memo that prevents more than one player from attempting a single free throw? Of course not. Because they never intended to make it illegal. I mean, let's use some common sense here, what rule fundamental is violated by letting more than one player attempt a single free throw? You're just being overly officious if you try to make this rule hold up. Let 'em play, I say! Try not to interrupt the flow of the game. Don't be so over-controlling!
Juulie - you must be really bored.
...and lovin' it!

bob jenkins Fri Jan 07, 2005 06:51pm
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett


However, no more than one player can attempt a single free throw. ;)
That's just your interp, Mark. I don't see anything in the Fed book that prevents it so it must be legal. You and Bruce may call the shots for the TBA, but out here in NFHS-land, we have the Lord High Rules Committee, and that's who we submit to. Look on their website. Do you see any interp or memo that prevents more than one player from attempting a single free throw? Of course not. Because they never intended to make it illegal. I mean, let's use some common sense here, what rule fundamental is violated by letting more than one player attempt a single free throw? You're just being overly officious if you try to make this rule hold up. Let 'em play, I say! Try not to interrupt the flow of the game. Don't be so over-controlling!
Juulie's body has been taken over by the spirit of Nevadaref. Call the exorcist.

Jurassic Referee Fri Jan 07, 2005 06:58pm
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett


However, no more than one player can attempt a single free throw. ;)
That's just your interp, Mark. I don't see anything in the Fed book that prevents it so it must be legal. You and Bruce may call the shots for the TBA, but out here in NFHS-land, we have the Lord High Rules Committee, and that's who we submit to. Look on their website. Do you see any interp or memo that prevents more than one player from attempting a single free throw? Of course not. Because they never intended to make it illegal. I mean, let's use some common sense here, what rule fundamental is violated by letting more than one player attempt a single free throw? You're just being overly officious if you try to make this rule hold up. Let 'em play, I say! Try not to interrupt the flow of the game. Don't be so over-controlling!
Juulie's body has been taken over by the spirit of Nevadaref. Call the exorcist.
LOL!

Mark Dexter Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:15pm
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett

However, no more than one player can attempt a single free throw. ;)
What if there's a FT violation on the defensive team, and the FT misses? :p

tjones1 Sat Jan 08, 2005 05:46pm
I haven't seen this yet (I would use the word "never", but I know that'd do me in the next game I call). Wonder how much the crowd would be barking if I coach did this! :)

Mark Padgett Sat Jan 08, 2005 06:24pm
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett

However, no more than one player can attempt a single free throw. ;)
What if there's a FT violation on the defensive team, and the FT misses? :p
Since there's no one on the lane, the violation would have to be for a player breaking the three point line or coming below the free throw line extended. That's really, really, really dumb on a technical free throw since there can't be any rebound.

There is at least one other way a defensive player can violate on a technical free throw. Any guesses?

JugglingReferee Sat Jan 08, 2005 06:47pm
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett
There is at least one other way a defensive player can violate on a technical free throw. Any guesses?
Disconcertion.

Mark Dexter Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:09pm
No one's answered my question yet, though.

So much for sparking interest and getting people to look through the rulebook. :p


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1