|
|||
I think everyone is being too hard on Starman, except for nine01C, who I agree with. The situations as described should be called PC fouls. Yes, you must see the play before passing judgement and yes, most fans & coaches are not watching the defense but as described these should be PC fouls. I totally agree with nine01c that more block than PC fouls are called and I think officials are penalizing good defense. Hopefully at higher level games this call is made correctly more often than at lower levels.
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I think that's correct also
Quote:
Once the player has a legal guarding position on defense he can still move in guarding the offensive player and it would still be a PC if the offensive player continues into the body (chest)of the defense. Now if the offensive player hits the defense on the legs or gets head and shoulders past its a foul on the defense for moving into the offensive player. I think many officials who will see the defense move just a little (maybe a half step) and they call BLOCK! And I know I see more misses on the PC than the block as a HS official. Thanks David |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Z |
|
|||
Quote:
Z |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Hey Starman, I think some of my fellow officials would like to string you up by your ****s and hang you from a tree.
Despite some of the comments directed your way that because you are not an official, you cannot possibly know what you are talking about, I think we are mostly in agreement, that in the the situations you descibe, the defensive player has not fouled, there shoud be a PC foul called, or in the case of the offensive player attempting to go around the LGP defensive player and initiating some minor contact, a no-call, no matter how ugly the shot attempt ends up looking. I think your bigger concern is consistency among officials in making this call. Consistency among officials will always be an issue. See your other thread on advantage/disadvantage. What standardized training re: these types of calls is given to officials at the high school level? And how is this kind of thing monitored and/or corrected from game to game for individual officials? I work in your state, there is little/no standardized training for officials. You pass an open book test, bingo, you are a registered high school official. MN tends to leave training to individual associations or summer camps. It's hard to be an independent, the Minnesota State High School League encourages officials to join an association. Our association has a rookie program for new officials and we are are starting to do some observing within the association. Post game reviews w/your partner(s) help all officials improve. The better officials are going to get more games, the poorer officials will get weeded out. Understand it's not an exact science. |
|
|||
Red_Killian, no one here denies that the plays Star posted are PC fouls. What we disagree with is his assumption that every play of this type that he sees is a PC, when the official rules it a block. Just becauses he describes each one as a PC, it doesn't mean that's what's actually happening on the floor.
I addressed several situations where it's a foul on the defender or a no call. In those situations, he may not be seeing what I'm pointing out. Yes, the plays he posts are PC fouls, but that does mean that he's right about what's actually happening on the floor. |
Bookmarks |
|
|