The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 25, 2004, 11:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,988
Question

So I was discussing running the endline following a time out with Brandan89 tonight, and we came up with the following question:

Team A scores, B completes their throw in when the head coach of B requests a time out, the officials grant his request and the subsequent throw in will be on the endline. Is B able to run the endline or is this a designated spot throw in??
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 25, 2004, 11:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
No, not if the throw-in ends prior to the TO request. It would be a spot throw.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 25, 2004, 11:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 406
If B completes their throw-in (which you said they did) there will be a spot throw-in after the TO.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 26, 2004, 12:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,010
Unless you are in Washington state.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 26, 2004, 03:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,910
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Unless you are in Washington state.
Yep for the time being, but we're working on getting that fixed. Stand by, possible "change in interpretation" coming soon from the Washington State interpreters thanks to a little pressure from a couple of us who are regulars on this board. Power to the board.

Z
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 27, 2004, 09:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 572
This is another case where I'd like the time-outs given back to the players. Team A scores. Team B coach requests a time out. While you are hunting around for the head coach, make sure it's him, turn around, Team B has already inbounded the ball, when he actually requested time out before the throw in was made. So you grant the time out, now you have to award a spot throw-in, rather than run the baseline, which is what the coach wanted.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 27, 2004, 09:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,010
Quote:
Originally posted by FrankHtown
This is another case where I'd like the time-outs given back to the players. Team A scores. Team B coach requests a time out. While you are hunting around for the head coach, make sure it's him, turn around, Team B has already inbounded the ball, when he actually requested time out before the throw in was made. So you grant the time out, now you have to award a spot throw-in, rather than run the baseline, which is what the coach wanted.
While not really correct, most officials allow the team to run in this case.
If you really want to be strict about it, you could tell the coach that his players should have been looking for his TO request as well, perhaps even making one of their own, and not inbounded the ball.
Oh, if you are using a shot clock, you have to reset it if you are going to allow the team to have the endline.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 27, 2004, 09:14am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally posted by FrankHtown
This is another case where I'd like the time-outs given back to the players. Team A scores. Team B coach requests a time out. While you are hunting around for the head coach, make sure it's him, turn around, Team B has already inbounded the ball, when he actually requested time out before the throw in was made. So you grant the time out, now you have to award a spot throw-in, rather than run the baseline, which is what the coach wanted.
If the coach calls for timeout before the ball is inbounded and it takes me a second to recognize it, I'm giving them the end-line throwin rather than the spot throwin.
Same principal as when A1 grabs the ball and calls timeout just before falling out of bounds. The whistle never blows before he lands out of bounds, but you give him the timeout anyway. That's because you grant the time out based on when it was called, not when the whistle blows.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 27, 2004, 09:26am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Quote:
Originally posted by FrankHtown
This is another case where I'd like the time-outs given back to the players. Team A scores. Team B coach requests a time out. While you are hunting around for the head coach, make sure it's him, turn around, Team B has already inbounded the ball, when he actually requested time out before the throw in was made. So you grant the time out, now you have to award a spot throw-in, rather than run the baseline, which is what the coach wanted.
While not really correct, most officials allow the team to run in this case.
If you really want to be strict about it, you could tell the coach that his players should have been looking for his TO request as well, perhaps even making one of their own, and not inbounded the ball.
Oh, if you are using a shot clock, you have to reset it if you are going to allow the team to have the endline.
How is this not correct?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1