|
|||
TwoDot's explanation is right. If A2 is the only opponent of B1 who makes contact, the foul is on A2. However, the original question is: What do you have? I will confess that I will look very, very carefully at A3 so that *any* contact with B1 will be the contact I will call a foul. Nobody in the gym will be disappointed with a foul call on A3 since it was A3's conduct which violated the spirit of the rules.
|
|
|||
There is no way you can ever call a personal foul because the player hit a team-mate. Unless you can find some form of direct contact between A3 and B1 you've got to call the foul on B2.
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups |
|
|||
Quote:
If I'm remembering this correctly, there is a ruling where a player can be called for fouling another player without having actually made direct contact....but having violated the spirit of the rule. Given that, it would not be too far fetched to call a foul on player A3 for fouling player B1.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
Bookmarks |
|
|