The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 02, 2004, 02:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NeverNeverLand
Posts: 1,036
This is a great topic! I have had concerns on this as well.

It is my understanding that if, for ex: you are the C, opposite table, and have a foul, you become the C tableside.

If you are table side, same stitch, you are still the C table side.

If you are L opposite table, and have a foul, you become the C.

If you are the L table side, you become the trail.

If you are the L opposite table, you become the C.

If you are the L table side going the other way, you now become the new L. (long switch) T is new T.

If you are the T table side going the other way, you are now the new L.

Did I get them all?

Correct me Please!

__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words".
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 02, 2004, 02:34pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
thumpferee,

Do not complicate it. All you are doing is going table side on fouls in the front court. You are not automatically going to be the C or the T for example unless you know where the ball is being put in at.

If I call a foul from the C position (opposite table), there is no guarantee I am going to be the C when you switch to the side of the table.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 02, 2004, 02:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NeverNeverLand
Posts: 1,036
Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
thumpferee,

Do not complicate it. All you are doing is going table side on fouls in the front court. You are not automatically going to be the C or the T for example unless you know where the ball is being put in at.

If I call a foul from the C position (opposite table), there is no guarantee I am going to be the C when you switch to the side of the table.

Peace
Thanks Rut!

What if you are the L table side going the other way, ex: Player Control foul. Will you become the L on the long switch, or stay as the T and administer the throw in as the T?
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words".
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 02, 2004, 03:00pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Re: Throw in question (3-whistle)

Quote:
Originally posted by RookieDude
Rocky,
Good description of the V-back...that's what we have been doing per the WOA clinics.

Another question concerning 3-whistle:

Sideline throw-in in backcourt opposite side going to frontcourt...C's side.
Would old C administer the throw-in as new trail and "force" the old L to become new C and old T become new L opposite table?

Diagram 50 Page 66 in the Officials Manual shows this...just wondering if this also applies if it was C's side. (opposite table)

So as a general rule...do we administer throw-ins if the ball goes OOB on our sideline no matter which way we are going?




JCurrie got this one right for you RD...T will handle all throw-ins in the back-court, regardless of which side of the court...everybody else slides to correct positions...the one thing I have come across is the L's unwillingness to let go of the sideline oob calls - they keep wanting to call it when the ball goes out on the side, even tho the T has that sideline. Made for a couple of interesting double whistles the other night!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 02, 2004, 03:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally posted by rockyroad
Quote:
Originally posted by smoref
[B
Thank you Rocky,

That is what I was looking for. We were talking about it in our pre-game last night and nobody was sure what the WIAA wants us to do. It was a no league game so it wasn't a big deal but we want to have this down before dist. and state
No problem - it's a little unclear unless you were at one of the WIAA/WOA camps...where in the state are you??? [/B]
I am in Snohomish County and if you are who I think you are then we have a CC game together on 2/19 but I could be completely wrong.

Are you in Vancouver?



[Edited by smoref on Dec 2nd, 2004 at 03:16 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 02, 2004, 04:43pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Quote:
Originally posted by smoref
[
I am in Snohomish County and if you are who I think you are then we have a CC game together on 2/19 but I could be completely wrong.

Are you in Vancouver?



[Edited by smoref on Dec 2nd, 2004 at 03:16 PM]
Hmmm...I am in Vancouver, but on Feb. 19 I am at Pacific Lutheran...could you be Mr. Morris by any chance?
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 02, 2004, 04:53pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally posted by thumpferee


Thanks Rut!

What if you are the L table side going the other way, ex: Player Control foul. Will you become the L on the long switch, or stay as the T and administer the throw in as the T?
If your area advocates a long switch and you go table side, you might be the C or the L depending on where the ball is going to be put at.

If you live in my area, you will go back to the same position and stay at the same position and become the Trail.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 02, 2004, 06:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally posted by rockyroad
Quote:
Originally posted by smoref
[
I am in Snohomish County and if you are who I think you are then we have a CC game together on 2/19 but I could be completely wrong.

Are you in Vancouver?



[Edited by smoref on Dec 2nd, 2004 at 03:16 PM]
Hmmm...I am in Vancouver, but on Feb. 19 I am at Pacific Lutheran...could you be Mr. Morris by any chance?
Sorry about that, It is a D3 game. and yes you are correct sir
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 02, 2004, 09:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally posted by thumpferee
If you are the L table side going the other way, you now become the new L. (long switch) T is new T.
I believe JRut explained this the same way we do it in WA state.

The L would go back to the endline and become the new T going the other way...we call this a V-back.

As far as the T crossing the court to take the throw-in from C...that will surely have to be a pre-game item for us guys that have been doing 2-whistle forever.

BTW...I wonder why that scenario is not in the Officials Manual?
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 02, 2004, 10:39pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally posted by RookieDude
BTW...I wonder why that scenario is not in the Officials Manual?
Because they publish the book every two years. The changes came up before the new book could come out next year.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 03, 2004, 01:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:
Originally posted by RookieDude
BTW...I wonder why that scenario is not in the Officials Manual?
Because they publish the book every two years. The changes came up before the new book could come out next year.

Peace
I think we may be talking about two different things here.

I realize the book doesn't come out every year...therefore, the current Officials Manual doesn't show proper switches on certain fouls.

BUT, I am talking about the ball going OOB in the frontcourt and going the other way on C's side opposite table.

The following was posted:
In 3-man, the new trail has all back court throws-in. If the ball is to be put in on C's side, the C will go down and become to new L, L pulls back into C, and T crosses the court for the throw-in

If I'm reading this right...it is not what we have been advised to do in this area of the country.

In fact, I mentioned the above quote to a couple of my college official buddies...and they said the way they do it is the old C goes to new L, the old L becomes the new T (administers ball) and the old T (tableside) becomes the new C (tableside).
(BTW...it doesn't matter if C is tableside or not for this procedure)

This "feels" much better...and is how we did it the other night.

Rocky...do you agree?...or are you saying the old T (tableside) crosses the court to administer the throw-in (opposite table)?

You might know one of the guys I asked...he will be doing a couple games at Seattle Pacific on Dec. 27th and 28th I believe...Mr. Barlow.




[Edited by RookieDude on Dec 3rd, 2004 at 01:11 AM]
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 03, 2004, 03:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally posted by RookieDude

I think we may be talking about two different things here.

I realize the book doesn't come out every year...therefore, the current Officials Manual doesn't show proper switches on certain fouls.

BUT, I am talking about the ball going OOB in the frontcourt and going the other way on C's side opposite table.

The following was posted:
In 3-man, the new trail has all back court throws-in. If the ball is to be put in on C's side, the C will go down and become to new L, L pulls back into C, and T crosses the court for the throw-in


If I'm reading this right...it is not what we have been advised to do in this area of the country.


In fact, I mentioned the above quote to a couple of my college official buddies...and they said the way they do it is the old C goes to new L, the old L becomes the new T (administers ball) and the old T (tableside) becomes the new C (tableside).


This "feels" much better...and is how we did it the other night.

Rocky...do you agree?...or are you saying the old T (tableside) crosses the court to administer the throw-in (opposite table)?
The way I read it, both of these procedures are saying exactly the same thing (although one is very convoluted). The difference is that one is going directly from the pre turnover postions to the final postions and the other is starting in the location the official are in before the turnover but labeling what they would be after the turnover (as if the ball had remained inbound as in a steal). Then it makes the adjustment for the location of the ball.

Said another way, the blue one (as I've highlighted above) has the old T first transition to a L by nature of the ball being turned over. However, since the ball is to be thrown in opposite site, that old T/new L instead shifts to the C and the old L/new T must cross the court and the old C/new C instead shifts to the lead.

I've sketched a picture to illustrate this with the colors matching the text highlighted above....

__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 03, 2004, 04:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Thumbs up

Beautiful!

That is exactly how we did it!

Thanks Camaron...your illustrations and explanations were very helpful to this ol' 2-whistle Ref.
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 03, 2004, 10:21am
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
And I agree with Cameron - both posts had it right, just looking at the "positions" differently...I've met Mr. Barlow before, a few years ago...he knows his stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 03, 2004, 10:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,673
Send a message via MSN to IREFU2 Send a message via Yahoo to IREFU2
I am glad someone brough this up, I had a game the other night and we had that long switch. We pregamed that we would not do the long switch and of course a Varsity Official was sitting in the crowd from our board and blasted us about missing switches. I also went to a womans college camp this summer and they do the bump and slide which means that if there is a foul in the back court and the trail calls it, he/she reports the foul and stays with the ball. I like it like that, no need to rotate if you dont have too. But I guess in two man, they want a new look after the foul has been called. Just my two cents.
__________________
Score the Basket!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1