You lost me on this one...I am guessing the violation was on team B. A1 missed the first shot but got to re-shoot it due to the violation. Right? Did she not get to take the backside of the 1&1?

Here another question. A is awarded a 1&1. The first shot is missed but a lane violation is called. The replacement shot is made. A1 is entitled to another shot because she made the first shot of a 1&1. The table did not do anything. Was that an instance when the table should have got involved? I am not surprised they didn't because even if they had noticed the team that got shorted was the visitors.