|
|||
This sitution brought out a lot of discussion at our board meeting the other night so I thought I'd run it by this crew. This happened in a game one of our officials had and they weren't sure they got it right. A1 releases the ball on try. While the ball is in flight and outside the cylinder, A2 grabs and hangs on the rim (why, we don't know?!?!). Official immediately blows his whistle and bangs A2 with a technical foul. Ball subsequently enters the basket. Official waves off the basket. Question is since the ball was out of A1's hands and clearly in flight, should the basket have counted? I believe the technical foul does not immediately kill the play and, therefore, because the ball was out of A1's hand and clearly in flight, the goal should have counted. However, some other officials on our board felt that the technical foul immediately killed the play. The closest case book play I could find is 10.3.8D.
|
|
|||
Without a rule book, I will wing it.
The hanging on the rim would be a T, and also Goal Tending.... If a player is fouled during a shot, and the ball is hit away while in the cylinder, then the shot would count. I don't see why this would be different. (I do know the difference is a common personal and unsportsman like technical is the difference.) If A1 shoots the ball and on his way done, B1 punches him in his stomach, and the ball went in, would the goal count? |
|
|||
I think you got the correct case. The point of the case is not that the technical was called for elbows, but that a technical was called on the shooting team while the ball was in flight and the goal counts.
Look at NF rule 6.7.5 exception 1. It states the ball becomes dead on the whistle except if the whistle occurs while a try or tap is in flight. Although there seems to be conflicting rules (4.6.1 and 10.3.5) regarding touching the ring (intentionally) while the ball is in or above the cylinder as to whether it is BI or a T, I believe the T takes precedence. The conflict may be moot in your case, because you seem to indicate the ball was in flight, but not necessarily over the cylinder when A2 grabbed the ring. [Edited by Mark Padgett on Feb 5th, 2001 at 03:24 PM] |
|
|||
I agree. The ball itself was not touched--so no goaltending--and the ball was not ON the ring when the player grabbed the rim--so no basket interference. Would not have mattered if the ball was within the imaginary cylinder above the ring, as long as the player didn't touch the ball. So, count the basket and assess the "T".
|
|
|||
No, the T does not kill the shot but where was the ball when A2 let go of the rim? If he was still holding onto the rim and the ball entered the basket, we have BI.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Different Play A1 is in the act of shooting but the ball is not yet in flight when (a) A2 fouls B2, or (b) B2 fouls A2. The shot goes in. Does the basket count in (a) or (b)?
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
Walter is correct that NFHS Casebook Play 10.3.8D is the play that covers this situation. The key as to whether A1's try for goal will be scored is whether A2 was still touching the rim when the ball went through the basket. If A2 was touching the rim when the ball went through the rim A2 is also of guilty of offensive basket interference and the goal does not count. If A2 was not touching the basket the goal does count. But you still have a technical foul on A2 for grabbing the rim.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials Ohio High School Athletic Association Toledo, Ohio |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials Ohio High School Athletic Association Toledo, Ohio |
|
|||
See 6-7-5 and ex 1-3 and the note
If A's try is released then the graping by A2 occurs count the basket and award the T. (EX 1) If A's is in the act of shooting but not released before the grasping ball is dead immediately and no shot as this is a foul by the offense (ex 3) If the ball is over the rim when the grasping occurs BI cancel the basket and award the T (see note and 10.5.3b casebook) |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
Quote:
You can only have basket interference if a player touches the ball while it is in the cylinder OR if a player touches the rim while the ball is ON the rim. That's it. You cannot have BI for the ball being within the cylinder and the player touching the rim (no matter what coaches and fans say!) Ruling: Assess the technical. If the ball goes in, it counts. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
Bookmarks |
|
|