The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Ron Artest (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/16542-ron-artest.html)

JRutledge Sun Nov 21, 2004 03:14pm

Wouda, couda, shouda, but didn’t.

I agree that Artest should not have approached the fan in any way. But I understand why he did and think many others would do the same. When you throw something at anyone, be prepared for their reaction. When Artest went into the stands, he should be prepared for the reaction as well. I really have no problem with what his teammates did at all, because they were getting their teammate of a bad situation. They had every right to hit whoever was attacking them. The fans when they came onto the floor should have been prepared for the reaction the received as well.

Players should not have their space violated. Whether it is a thrown object or the presence of people threatening them directly, the players have a right to work in a place that they do not have to put up with that kind of behavior. If you really want to talk about morals and professionalism, let us address the use of alcohol at sporting events. Let us address how if that kind of behavior was in any other segment of society, they people would not be allowed to participate in the event.

Like I have always said here, you can be right and wrong at the same time. Maybe Artest will loose some games and so will his teammates. Yes the fans did not deserve being attacked. But just because you do something, does not mean someone will not react to you. In many circles the action of this fan would have brought much more than a couple of punches to his face. I blame them first because they were the spark that started the fire. And individuals that had nothing to do with the altercation continued their despicable behavior. There where children around and in the area. None of these adults took any account of that.

Peace

JRutledge Sun Nov 21, 2004 03:21pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: That is the worst thing I have ever seen in an American sporting event.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra


These idiot fans are not sectioned off in their own area you know.

Same scene happens and I'll add a wrinkle. What if on that trip over those 10 rows to this idiot, Artest runs through and steps on a 5 year old and seriously injures or KILLS this kid? There was an elderly woman on the bottom of the pile behind that bench.

Ask yourself this, what if your child, mother or grandmother was injured or killed by one of these players storming after an idiot that threw LIQUID in a plastic cup, would you still think it's okay?

Then I would sue the individual that started the altercation. Why are you throwing things when you were not involved in the on court fight? Why are you drinking like an idiot in public and cannot control your actions? The NBA is just as responsible and should be sued by players that have continuously have seen these events and allow them time and time again.

I am not saying the player take no responsibility. I am saying that we need to stop justifying the actions of adults that drink and say anything. As far as I am concerned, the women that got hit in the face should take a great deal of responsibility for her noise being broken when you confront players and say things to people you would never say outside of that sporting event. I do not know about you, but I have seen some people get in the face and call a person names and usually they did not just walk away. Maybe their first reaction was not to throw a punch, but they did not just stand there and take it.

Peace

blindzebra Sun Nov 21, 2004 03:23pm

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
Wouda, couda, shouda, but didn’t.

I agree that Artest should not have approached the fan in any way. But I understand why he did and think many others would do the same. When you throw something at anyone, be prepared for their reaction. When Artest went into the stands, he should be prepared for the reaction as well. I really have no problem with what his teammates did at all, because they were getting their teammate of a bad situation. They had every right to hit whoever was attacking them. The fans when they came onto the floor should have been prepared for the reaction the received as well.

Players should not have their space violated. Whether it is a thrown object or the presence of people threatening them directly, the players have a right to work in a place that they do not have to put up with that kind of behavior. If you really want to talk about morals and professionalism, let us address the use of alcohol at sporting events. Let us address how if that kind of behavior was in any other segment of society, they people would not be allowed to participate in the event.

Like I have always said here, you can be right and wrong at the same time. Maybe Artest will loose some games and so will his teammates. Yes the fans did not deserve being attacked. But just because you do something, does not mean someone will not react to you. In many circles the action of this fan would have brought much more than a couple of punches to his face. I blame them first because they were the spark that started the fire. And individuals that had nothing to do with the altercation continued their despicable behavior. There where children around and in the area. None of these adults took any account of that.

Peace

Actually a player DID start this, Ben Wallace started it. When he over-reacted to Artest's foul and clocked Artest. He then continued after Artest by throwing a towel at Artest while he lay on the scorer's table.

Let's put it in a different context. Someone is in a parking lot outside a bar and some drunken idiot throws a beer at them, they get in their car and drive through dozens of innocent people to run over the beer thrower.

Justified?

zebraman Sun Nov 21, 2004 04:26pm

Re: Re: Re: That is the worst thing I have ever seen in an American sporting event.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:

Originally posted by zebraman


You don't blame any of the players at all? You're fine with Artest and Steven Jackson going up into the stands and pounding on people who may or may not have been the ones throwing beer at them? Self defense is one thing, but going into the stands to pound on people? Come on.

Z

I do not blame the players at all. What the fans did is far and away the issue that started the may lay. If the fan never threw anything, no player would have felt compelled to go after them. They sell alcohol to these fools and they let them say whatever comes to mind. I understand that the fans pay money to watch games, but that does not give them the right to behave in any way shape or form because you pay some money. If that was in any other arena, you honestly believe that the person that got hit with a full cup of beer is going to just sit there while you do it?

Sorry Z, you can come up with all this morality crap and "they are professionals" BS all you like. I think if a fan has the balls to throw something at people, they deserve everything they get after that.

Even if Artest was wrong in his actions that gave the two fans no right to enter the court. That gave the fans that were not involved in any way to throw beer on players and coaches. I do not blame the players at all. NOT ONE BIT!!

Peace

LOL. Some of your most intelligent comments ever. LOL! Rut for NBA commissioner. LOL! Let's start letting murder defendents off the hook for self defense if the victim poured beer on them first. Good call.

The fans were idiots. Nobody is debating that. However, Artests and Jacksons actions were criminal and there is no justication for that.

Actually, the last time I went to an NBA game was about 10 years ago. Some drunken idiot behind me did spill beer on me and was swearing and being a dumbass from the opening whistle. Did I turn around and beat the heck out of him? Nope. I moved. Another option may have been to go get security to have him ejected. Even had it been intentional, spilling beer on someone is not the same as taking swings at someone which could maim or even kill.

Z

[Edited by zebraman on Nov 21st, 2004 at 04:42 PM]

Sal Giaco Sun Nov 21, 2004 05:59pm

I think a few people are missing the boat here. I'll try to sum it up this way...

1. Ben Wallace should have never shoved Artest
2. The fan should have never thrown a cup of beer at Artest
3. The fans behaved like the typical drunken idiots that they are

You can blame the whole altercation on the Pistons and their fans and you're probably 100% right but guess what...... that still does NOT justify Artest and his teamates going into the stands and taking matters into their own hands.

Indiana fans can blame everything on everyone else but the bottom line is the NBA dropped the axe on Artest, O'Neal and Jackson - that's atleast 50% of their scoring that will disappear for most of the regular season. Now you tell me who the idiots are....?

One other note - Why was Artest laying down on the scorer's table anyway? Doing a dumb thing like this make's you a prime taget fan abuse. Does that mean he deserved to get a beer thrown at him? Absolutely NOT. However, when you do stupids things like that you put yourself in bad situations. I think there were plenty of areas he could have went to other than where he went. Again, I'm not justifying a fan throwing an object at him but his smart a$$ personality led him to once again, make some bad choices.

[Edited by Sal Giaco on Nov 21st, 2004 at 06:20 PM]

JRutledge Sun Nov 21, 2004 06:33pm

Yeah, that is exactly what I am saying.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
Actually a player DID start this, Ben Wallace started it. When he over-reacted to Artest's foul and clocked Artest. He then continued after Artest by throwing a towel at Artest while he lay on the scorer's table.

Let's put it in a different context. Someone is in a parking lot outside a bar and some drunken idiot throws a beer at them, they get in their car and drive through dozens of innocent people to run over the beer thrower.

Justified?

Sure that makes since. Of course. Why not?

It amazes me how people take things to the extreme to justify their point of view. :rolleyes:

Peace

blindzebra Sun Nov 21, 2004 06:41pm

Re: Yeah, that is exactly what I am saying.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
Actually a player DID start this, Ben Wallace started it. When he over-reacted to Artest's foul and clocked Artest. He then continued after Artest by throwing a towel at Artest while he lay on the scorer's table.

Let's put it in a different context. Someone is in a parking lot outside a bar and some drunken idiot throws a beer at them, they get in their car and drive through dozens of innocent people to run over the beer thrower.

Justified?

Sure that makes since. Of course. Why not?

It amazes me how people take things to the extreme to justify their point of view. :rolleyes:

Peace

So, you are saying KILLING an innocent bystander is okay if you get hit with liquid? Unfreakin believable. There is nothing extreme about it. You don't think it was possible in that situation for a small child to have been seriously hurt or killed by a 6'8" 230 pound person completely out of control?

FYI, the NBA does not agree. Artest just got the boot for the season and his punch happy teammates are gone for 30 and 25.;)

JRutledge Sun Nov 21, 2004 06:58pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: That is the worst thing I have ever seen in an American sporting event.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by zebraman


LOL. Some of your most intelligent comments ever. LOL! Rut for NBA commissioner. LOL! Let's start letting murder defendents off the hook for self defense if the victim poured beer on them first. Good call.

You can be sarcastic all you like, but I never said that you do not punish the players or not take action. But I think the actions of the players and how the league handles it are two different things. I would suggest that what the league has done (suspensions) was too far and they are not taking action to prevent this type of behavior.

Quote:

Originally posted by zebraman
The fans were idiots. Nobody is debating that. However, Artests and Jacksons actions were criminal and there is no justication for that.
So was the action of the fans. The throwing of the beer is assault. I say take them all to court over this issue.

Actually, the last time I went to an NBA game was about 10 years ago. Some drunken idiot behind me did spill beer on me and was swearing and being a dumbass from the opening whistle. Did I turn around and beat the heck out of him? Nope. I moved.[/B][/QUOTE]

What if that clown threw beer or any drink at your kids face? Do you really think you would just move on? And the issue is not about someone spilling a beer and being obnoxious. We are talking about someone throwing beer, a chair and other objects in the direction of players. Then coming onto the court and confronting players.

Quote:

Originally posted by zebraman
Another option may have been to go get security to have him ejected. Even had it been intentional, spilling beer on someone is not the same as taking swings at someone which could maim or even kill.
I think you need to read my comments again. I did not say any action was justified. I said I understand. I think we were talking about blame here and how things got out of hand. And if you do not want someone to attack you, you do not throw things at them. If you do not want people to react to you, you do not say certain things to them. If you do not want to get hurt, try everything you can to keep yourself out of a situation in which you play no personal role.

Now the NBA took action, but I would sue the pants of the NBA and any other organization that allows fans to drink beer and act out of hand. I do not drink beer or much alcohol at all. I do not understand the need to sell beer and to drink beer at sporting events. If you cannot enjoy the game without getting drunk, I really will never understand that. You cannot sell beer at college sporting events for the most part. Fans enjoy themselves there. The NBA and these other leagues want to have a family atmosphere, yet they allow drinking and other less than responsible behavior to continue at games.

This was not the first time something like this happen, it will not be the last. I think all pro players have a right to be protected from this kind of fan behavior. And I think the NBA Player's Association has a legitimate beef with the NBA and so does MLB to file grievances with their respective leagues on how the fans have confronted players.

Peace

JRutledge Sun Nov 21, 2004 07:20pm

Re: Re: Yeah, that is exactly what I am saying.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra


So, you are saying KILLING an innocent bystander is okay if you get hit with liquid? Unfreakin believable. There is nothing extreme about it. You don't think it was possible in that situation for a small child to have been seriously hurt or killed by a 6'8" 230 pound person completely out of control?

Yeah, that is what I said. So much you totally missed the sarcasm in my post. I really hope you are not that emotional you can understand sarcasm? Basically what you said was asinine and is the reason I say, "Sure!"

Did the swarms of fans take into account the children or older individuals around? I find it funny you want to put this on Artest and not the thousands of people that were standing around.

The funny thing is that is not the issue. There were no children hurt. There was an elderly person in part of the fight, but I do not know if that was as a result of the actual fight in the stands with players. There were swarms of people that interjected themselves into an issue that totally took place on the court.

Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
FYI, the NBA does not agree. Artest just got the boot for the season and his punch happy teammates are gone for 30 and 25.;)
I do not know that the NBA agrees or disagrees with my point of view. The NBA is doing what is essentially what a PR move is. They are not doing what is in the best interest of the players that they have to protect from being seen as "justifying" the behavior of their players. But in all other incidences when alcohol is involved, laws and rules in many places have made policies for behavior. The NBA and these leagues have allowed drinking to go on and do not take the actions as is typical in other arenas as it relates to conduct of customers. If this was a bar, Artest and O'Neal would have an issue with the bar that did not provide the proper security at their job or of other customers.

Peace

blindzebra Sun Nov 21, 2004 07:32pm

Re: Re: Re: Yeah, that is exactly what I am saying.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra


So, you are saying KILLING an innocent bystander is okay if you get hit with liquid? Unfreakin believable. There is nothing extreme about it. You don't think it was possible in that situation for a small child to have been seriously hurt or killed by a 6'8" 230 pound person completely out of control?

Yeah, that is what I said. So much you totally missed the sarcasm in my post. I really hope you are not that emotional you can understand sarcasm? Basically what you said was asinine and is the reason I say, "Sure!"

Did the swarms of fans take into account the children or older individuals around? I find it funny you want to put this on Artest and not the thousands of people that were standing around.

The funny thing is that is not the issue. There were no children hurt. There was an elderly person in part of the fight, but I do not know if that was as a result of the actual fight in the stands with players. There were swarms of people that interjected themselves into an issue that totally took place on the court.

Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
FYI, the NBA does not agree. Artest just got the boot for the season and his punch happy teammates are gone for 30 and 25.;)
I do not know that the NBA agrees or disagrees with my point of view. The NBA is doing what is essentially what a PR move is. They are not doing what is in the best interest of the players that they have to protect from being seen as "justifying" the behavior of their players. But in all other incidences when alcohol is involved, laws and rules in many places have made policies for behavior. The NBA and these leagues have allowed drinking to go on and do not take the actions as is typical in other arenas as it relates to conduct of customers. If this was a bar, Artest and O'Neal would have an issue with the bar that did not provide the proper security at their job or of other customers.

Peace


We are talking liquid in plastic cups, popcorn in paper containers. This is not a gun, a knife, a pipe, a bat,a fist, or batteries, it was LIQUID.

The fans that are caught on tape should go to jail, and so should the players.

Like I said in my first post, if a fan is on the court fine it's an actual threat of attack and fine, knock them out, that is self defense.

Going into the stands trampling over INNOCENT people, escalating a situation that endangered even more people is not self defense, it is a crime.

I'd hate to think that you are so emotional that you'd condone stupid and dangerous behavior as justified.

JRutledge Sun Nov 21, 2004 07:55pm

Murder?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
We are talking liquid in plastic cups, popcorn in paper containers. This is not a gun, a knife, a pipe, a bat,a fist, or batteries, it was LIQUID.
No sh!t McFly!! You went to school to learn that logic you keep using?

Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
The fans that are caught on tape should go to jail, and so should the players.
Not sure I agree. The action of certain players can be taken into account based on their role in the incident.

Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
Like I said in my first post, if a fan is on the court fine it's an actual threat of attack and fine, knock them out, that is self defense.
Well that is what happen in other incidents.


Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
Going into the stands trampling over INNOCENT people, escalating a situation that endangered even more people is not self defense, it is a crime.
Oh PUULEEESSS!!! Artest did not trample over anyone to get to that guy that threw the beer. He went right at the guy and knew who he wanted to retaliate against. It might be a crime to hit the guy. But that is for a judge and a prosecutor to determine. No one here is going to make that decision ultimately. And you do not know the laws in the state of Michigan and how those laws will be enforced. Charges could be dropped and they might decide to go after the fans that participated. The NBA cannot suspend fans, but the law can take actions against people that violated the law. I am sure there will be more than fans that will get prosecuted here.

Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
I'd hate to think that you are so emotional that you'd condone stupid and dangerous behavior as justified.
I did not condone or justify anyone's behavior. I am saying that if you do not want to start a fire, you do not play with matches. You are trying to make this a moral issue based on what is essentially a lie. Then you try to compare a situation that did not take place to justify you point of view. Murder? Trampling? Involuntary Homicide? It is very silly to me when you try to misrepresent the actions of all parties. No one was killed or shot anyone with a gun. There were no fans trampled by Artest. There were fans that interjected themselves on an on-court event. Now that did happen. There were fans that were not involved in the fight between Artest and that beer throwing fan and started hitting players that did not hit them. I did see O'Neal protecting himself when they went after Artest. Now the camera did not show everything and I was not there in person to know for sure. I do know that if someone was hitting me from behind in the back of the head, I am sure I would not just sit there and take it.

Peace

Dan_ref Sun Nov 21, 2004 08:44pm


For all you clowns blaming the fans for this mess:

What Ron Artest lost: $5,200,000 (his 04/05 NBA salary).

What the guy who threw the beer lost: $8 (beer's expensive at sports venues).

Artest showed us all how tough he is. Don't disrespect Ron Artest. No sir, do not test Ron Artest.

Teaching us all that lesson only cost him $5,200,000. So far.

blindzebra Sun Nov 21, 2004 09:06pm

Re: Murder?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
We are talking liquid in plastic cups, popcorn in paper containers. This is not a gun, a knife, a pipe, a bat,a fist, or batteries, it was LIQUID.
No sh!t McFly!! You went to school to learn that logic you keep using?

Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
The fans that are caught on tape should go to jail, and so should the players.
Not sure I agree. The action of certain players can be taken into account based on their role in the incident.

Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
Like I said in my first post, if a fan is on the court fine it's an actual threat of attack and fine, knock them out, that is self defense.
Well that is what happen in other incidents.


Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
Going into the stands trampling over INNOCENT people, escalating a situation that endangered even more people is not self defense, it is a crime.
Oh PUULEEESSS!!! Artest did not trample over anyone to get to that guy that threw the beer. He went right at the guy and knew who he wanted to retaliate against. It might be a crime to hit the guy. But that is for a judge and a prosecutor to determine. No one here is going to make that decision ultimately. And you do not know the laws in the state of Michigan and how those laws will be enforced. Charges could be dropped and they might decide to go after the fans that participated. The NBA cannot suspend fans, but the law can take actions against people that violated the law. I am sure there will be more than fans that will get prosecuted here.

Quote:

Originally posted by blindzebra
I'd hate to think that you are so emotional that you'd condone stupid and dangerous behavior as justified.
I did not condone or justify anyone's behavior. I am saying that if you do not want to start a fire, you do not play with matches. You are trying to make this a moral issue based on what is essentially a lie. Then you try to compare a situation that did not take place to justify you point of view. Murder? Trampling? Involuntary Homicide? It is very silly to me when you try to misrepresent the actions of all parties. No one was killed or shot anyone with a gun. There were no fans trampled by Artest. There were fans that interjected themselves on an on-court event. Now that did happen. There were fans that were not involved in the fight between Artest and that beer throwing fan and started hitting players that did not hit them. I did see O'Neal protecting himself when they went after Artest. Now the camera did not show everything and I was not there in person to know for sure. I do know that if someone was hitting me from behind in the back of the head, I am sure I would not just sit there and take it.

Peace

This is my last reply because you obviously DON'T get it.

There was no reason to go in the stands NONE, ZIP, NADA. Nothing that was done justifies what happened. No way Artest saw who threw the beer, the tape shows him looking up and toward the court, AND the guy he attacked was still HOLDING a cup.

You like to say I'm going to extremes, but you have yet to disprove that there were innocent fans between the court and where the fighting took place.And large out of control men were going over, through, and past them to attack who they THOUGHT threw beer at them.

That is no different then idiots shooting at each other past innocent people. The fact that nobody got seriously hurt, does not lessen the risk that two groups of idiots put them under, because they cannot control themselves.

Neither side was justified in their actions, and all of them should be punished for what happened. That is NOT PR it's called JUSTICE.

mick Sun Nov 21, 2004 09:08pm

Oh, my!!!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_ref

For all you clowns blaming the fans for this mess:

What Ron Artest lost: $5,200,000 (his 04/05 NBA salary).

What the guy who threw the beer lost: $8 (beer's expensive at sports venues).

Artest showed us all how tough he is. Don't disrespect Ron Artest. No sir, do not test Ron Artest.

Teaching us all that lesson only cost him $5,200,000. So far.

I don't think that year suspension will fly.
at least I hop it doesn't.
Seems like cruel and unusual punishment to me.
mick

BktBallRef Sun Nov 21, 2004 09:15pm

Artest is getting a long vacation. Just as well, you can't play away games when you're in jail.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1