Quote:
Originally posted by Nu1
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
Quote:
Originally posted by Nu1
A1 driving the lane to score goes airborne...B1 is set up to take a charge...B2 fouls A1 in the act of shooting...then A1 comes down and runs into/over B1. (I should also say that B2 fouled A1 from the side. It didn't appear that B2's action could have caused the contact between A1 and B1.)
|
This would be a false double foul, not a false multiple foul. Double fouls involve fouls by players on opposite teams; multiple fouls involve fouls by players on the same team.
|
It's not a false double because both fouls were committed by B players against a single A player. Not A against B against A.
|
Rainmaker...I may not have been too clear on my new situation, but judging from the responses, I think my situation (The "A1 driving the lane..." scenario above)would be a false double foul.
In seeing the play I described, the first foul is B2 against A1 and the second foul is A1 against B1 (offensive).
This seems like a possible scenario in many games with people driving the lane and some defenders going for blocked shots while others may be setting up for the charge call. Although, I have never seen it called.
|
Nu1, I believe you're right about the false double in your scenario. Check out case play 4.19.6 A. It does not say whether it's a false double but the penalty looks like the penalty for a false double.
Mon Oct 18, 2004, 09:32pm
Threaded Mode
