new rule question

[JRutledge]

That is not what the rule is stating. I realize that the rule might be not written very well. I also realize that this could seen the way you describe it. But in the funny book, there is clearly a description of what the intent of this rule is. I do not see anyone realistically calling a T because someone just put their hand up. This rule was to stop someone from putting the ball directly in the eyes of another player. The fear seems to be that you could poke someone in the eye or scratch their face. I am sure this will have to be cleared up and the casebook might specify the intentions of this rule. It is just clear to me that by the picture on page 7 of the Simplified and Illustrated Rulebook they are trying to prevent a very specific behavior.

I had this happen in a game about 7 years ago. I just called a foul. This happen in an NBA game this past year to Tracy McGrady and I think all was called was a foul. This must have been a problem and this rule was to remedy this action.

Peace