|
Okay, I'm confused. let's see if we can ask the questions that will straighten this thing out a little.
1) (a)It appears that screening and guarding are two different animals and (b) the rules that apply to them are different. Is that the case? (PS This is a two-part yes/no question. No essay required).
2) From the rule book it seems that guarding is done only by defenders. The definition appears to exclude offense from guarding. Right? Yes/No -- with some small explanation
3) The rule book doesn't seem to eliminate the possibility that a defender would set an illegal screen. It apparently doesn't happen very often, but it's still within the legal definitions?
4) What are the subtle differences between illegal screens and legal guarding? between legal screens and illegal guarding? etc
|
Fri May 28, 2004, 08:47am
Threaded Mode
