|
|||
Quote:
2) apples and oranges! Btw, if you get tired of arguing this, we could always switch sides for a while. You argue for the T, and I'll argue for a violation. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
9-11-01 http://www.fallenheroesfund.org/fallenheroes/index.php http://www.carydufour.com/marinemoms...llowribbon.jpg |
|
|||
good job Jurassic
Jurassic Referee, I am glad you brought this up because when I read the original thread the thought of 10-3-3 entered my mind as well. You're right; it is worth a discussion. You never said which way you would call it, but it begs the question.
It seems to me that we all agree that this is at minimum a violation. Personally, I would go with this. A turnover is a reasonable punishment to me. Two shots and the ball is a little harsh. I have seen, the thrower release the ball, run behind the screen by staying out of bounds and enter the court to receive a pass- in this situation, it's definitely a T- but I only call it if the pass comes back to that player, hence an advantage gained.
__________________
"referee the defense" |
|
|||
Quote:
A player who leaves the court in order to get open is leaving the court for an unauthorized reason. |
|
|||
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Eric Huechteman
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
However, since the case book gives 3 illustrations of applying 10-3-3 and none of applying 9-2-12, a technical should be assessed, based on the preponderance of evidence. |
|
|||
Quote:
[/B][/QUOTE]Uh no, 10-3-3 deals specifically with players stepping out of bounds. It covers ALL situations, including throw-in situations. The only thing that you had right was that your source had no bearing at all on this situation. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Rabbit season!! Duck season!! Rabbit season!! Rabbit season!! Duck season --- Blammo!!! |
|
|||
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Snaqwells
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
|
|