Does this NIT timer know the rule?

[Nevadaref]

Originally posted by DJ
I disagree that the defender left the three point shot open. The reason the three point shot was open because the defender established legal guarding postition to take away the drive to the basket for which his reward for good play was a no call that allowed his opponent to get an uncontested three point attempt. We rewarded good offensive play but not good defensive play. Their reward was a no call.

I agree with you. The defender made a choice to cut off the drive instead of staying with the shooter. He made this choice as the dribbler was bring the ball up the court after catching it near mid-court. The defender made a good play and the official allowed his team to lose the game because of it.