The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 16, 2004, 08:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3
Anyone know why women's shot clock is only 30 seconds but men's is 35? Also, when did men's games go from quarters to halves --- and why?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 16, 2004, 09:27pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Lightbulb

Don't know why, but here are some dates:
1954 - Men go to halves
1971 - Women have 30 sec. shot clock
1975 - Women go to halves
1986 - Men have 45 sec. shot clock
1994 - Men have 35 sec. shot clock
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 17, 2004, 01:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
1986 - Men have 45 sec. shot clock
I think I remember that when the 45 second clock was introduced as an experiment, it was used for the whole game except the last 4 minutes. I have no idea why it was done that way, but I can distinctly remembering yelling at the TV, "Then what's the point!?!?!" Almost the only time that you ever saw the 4-corner stall was in the last 4 minutes. And that's when they turned off the shot clock. Dumb.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 17, 2004, 01:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,643
I actually like when the shot clock is turned off at the end. It forces them to actually play defense rather than just wait 35 seconds and hope for a rebound.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 17, 2004, 01:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by Brian48823
Anyone know why women's shot clock is only 30 seconds but men's is 35?
Prior to Title IX, women did not play under the auspices of the NCAA. They formed the AIAW in 1972, estalishing their own rules, and using a 30 second shot clock. That didn't change after the NCAA and AIAW merged 1982. It's still used today.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 17, 2004, 02:41pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by Brian48823
Anyone know why women's shot clock is only 30 seconds but men's is 35?
Prior to Title IX, women did not play under the auspices of the NCAA. They formed the AIAW in 1972, estalishing their own rules, and using a 30 second shot clock. That didn't change after the NCAA and AIAW merged 1982. It's still used today.

Oh. I thought it was because wimmen were shorter.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 17, 2004, 04:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias

I think I remember that when the 45 second clock was introduced as an experiment, it was used for the whole game except the last 4 minutes. I have no idea why it was done that way, but I can distinctly remembering yelling at the TV, "Then what's the point!?!?!" Almost the only time that you ever saw the 4-corner stall was in the last 4 minutes. And that's when they turned off the shot clock. Dumb.
Then you don't recall the real impetus for adding it: Dean Smith. He'd sometimes go into four corners in the first half if he had the lead and didn't think his team could keep it. There was a Duke vs. UNC game that 7-5 at the half and final was 21-20. That would be a boring game. I'm sure there were other examples but I don't have the time to search for them.

I think the original idea was that they didn't want the whole game to be a stall game so that there would be something to watch. But, they held onto the idea that a team that earned a lead near the end of the game should not be forced to take action....it was up to the defense to attack the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 18, 2004, 05:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,217
I like shot clock for entire game. Just because you got a lead doesn't mean we want to watch you drbble pas and cut 40 feet away from the basket. Never liked it, never will.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 18, 2004, 07:25am
Huck Finn
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,347
I don't think there is any way Villanova would have beat Georgetown in 85' with a shot clock.
Then again if the point guard hadn't been pumped up with cocaine they might not have won either.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1