The Official Forum
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Backcourt? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/11894-backcourt.html)

BktBallRef Mon Jan 26, 2004 10:35am
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Also look at last year's 9-9 Exception 1 (iirc).

Did the FED intend this (unannounced) change, or is it a sloppy editing job?
Bob, this is the play that got buried on McGriff that we were discussing. Do you see why I was saying it's a violation?

The change is listed under Major Editorial Changes.
"9-9-3 New Article was added to replace the previous exceptions and note."

OverAndBack Mon Jan 26, 2004 11:00am
Re: Re: Just a newbie, but....
 
Quote:
Originally posted by JugglingReferee
Quote:
Originally posted by OverAndBack
over and back (shameless username plug)
Are you saying that you're a violation? :D

A violation of what, I'm wondering.
Sorry, first name I could think of that was ref-related. :)

bob jenkins Mon Jan 26, 2004 01:54pm
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Also look at last year's 9-9 Exception 1 (iirc).

Did the FED intend this (unannounced) change, or is it a sloppy editing job?
Bob, this is the play that got buried on McGriff that we were discussing. Do you see why I was saying it's a violation?

The change is listed under Major Editorial Changes.
"9-9-3 New Article was added to replace the previous exceptions and note."

Yes -- I see why you say it's a violation. What I'm not sure about is whether the FED *wants* it to be a violation -- that is, did they intend to change what the rule says?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48am.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1