The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 04:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 15
OK......Player A1 has picked up a loose ball and has possesion. Player B1 comes runing into player A1 while reaching for the ball and causes too much contact. Player B1 is whistled for the foul but, right after this Player A1 while showing his frustration elbows Player B1.

I felt that the elbow was not a flagrant or a technical situation but was enough of a foul and it was certain that something had to be called on A1. So, after I called the the fould on B1, I called another foul on A1 (one whistle after the other). After talking with my partner it was decided that we would go with altenating posession nearest the fouls.

I feel good about how it was handled but am not sure it is the correct call.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 04:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,988
A1's foul should have been ignored unless it was deemed intentional or flagerant. An elbow on a dead ball in my eyes could start a fight, so i would've given a1 a flagerant technical, so B gets the ball at halfcourt across from the scorer.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 04:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by WAZebra
OK......Player A1 has picked up a loose ball and has possesion. Player B1 comes runing into player A1 while reaching for the ball and causes too much contact. Player B1 is whistled for the foul but, right after this Player A1 while showing his frustration elbows Player B1.

I felt that the elbow was not a flagrant or a technical situation but was enough of a foul and it was certain that something had to be called on A1. So, after I called the the foul on B1, I called another foul on A1 (one whistle after the other). After talking with my partner it was decided that we would go with altenating posession nearest the fouls.

I feel good about how it was handled but am not sure it is the correct call.
'Fraid not, partner. The contact is during a dead ball. Therefore, it is a technical foul or it's nothing at all. But it can't be a personal foul. If you call the T, then it is a false double foul. The T may or may not be flagrant. Shoot all required FTs and give the ball to B at the division line.

You handled it as a double personal foul, which was incorrect.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 05:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 15
Thanks guys!

Wow.....this is awesome it took only a few minutes to have two of you confirm that I screwed up. I won't tell anyone because everyone here at home thinks I am perfect.....lol
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 05:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Re: Thanks guys!

Quote:
Originally posted by WAZebra
I won't tell anyone because everyone here at home thinks I am perfect.....lol
So, you're single!

These board is very busy, especially this time of year. Rarely do posts go very long without being replied to. It's more like conversation than a discussion board.

Welcome aboard!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1