The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 01:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by DrakeM
BBallref,

My point was that The NF, SHOULD make that simple clarification.
I understood your point.

I thought I agreed.
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 01:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef


Then, from hence forth, I decree that you will be forever known as...

...snowmaker, the white wizard!

Where did you find that flattering picture? I'm not nearly that attractive.
I just thought you were taller and slimmer! This guy doesn't run very well, unless you consider melting, running.
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 01:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 14
Think of it this way. The possesion arrow was switched to b
when the ball was touched. The next throw in for a is because of the kick violation.
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 01:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 25
Send a message via ICQ to SHellmueller Send a message via AIM to SHellmueller
Maybe I am oversimplifying things here, but I look at a kick by the defensive team the same as a tip in which the defensive player has no chance to catch the ball.

In the sitch wth 1 second left, defense up by one, the defender SHOULD do anything he can to touch the ball. This could be a kick, a slap, or a tip, or even an all-out dive to knock the ball OOB. That's good defense, because the clock will likely run out. Yes, it's a violation, and the penalty is that the offensive team gets the ball, possibly with some time elapsed. If the offense does not want to be "disadvantaged" by having to make another throw-in, they should simply make an excellent throw-in that cannot be touched by the defense.

Julie, I always look at any defensive violation (besides BI/GT) this way: The defense tried to improve it's situation (by getting the ball!), but failed to do so legally. So we put things back just as the were before the violation. Offense gets the ball back, no one gains or loses.

In contrast, being the offensive team carries with it the RIGHT to score (duh) and the RESPONSIBILITY to avoid violations.

Does that make any sense?
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 02:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by SHellmueller
Julie, I always look at any defensive violation (besides BI/GT) this way: The defense tried to improve it's situation (by getting the ball!), but failed to do so legally. So we put things back just as the were before the violation.
I understand your point of view. It's just not mine. It doesn't look to me as though things have gone back to the way they were since A no longer has the arrow. But obviously, the rules committee sees it from your perspective, not mine. Now when it's MY turn to be God...
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 02:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
This guy doesn't run very well, unless you consider melting, running.
Reminds me of a book spoof I saw way, way back in the 70's called The Joy of Non-Running. There's a picture in there of a guy sort of draped over a chair, sitting next to a table with a brie cheese. The caption is something to the effect that the cheese was ahead in the non-running contest, until the weather heated up and the cheese melted (and thus ran) all over the table. Actually, it's not a bad description of how I spend a lot of my days.
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 02:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Huh. "The white wizard" and "Bree" mentioned in the same thread. Ever hang out at the Prancing Pony, Juulie?
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 02:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Smile

Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Huh. "The white wizard" and "Bree" mentioned in the same thread. Ever hang out at the Prancing Pony, Juulie?
Shucks! No response to the "hobbitses" comment.

I bet Juules doesn't know where the Bree or the Prancing Pony is.
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 02:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Shucks! No response to the "hobbitses" comment.
I'm bigger than that
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 02:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Shucks! No response to the "hobbitses" comment.
I'm bigger than that
Bigger than that as in "Gimli."
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 07:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Huh. "The white wizard" and "Bree" mentioned in the same thread. Ever hang out at the Prancing Pony, Juulie?
It's been a long, long time.

Actually, Bree is also a character in a C.S.Lewis book which I dearly love, "The Horse and His Boy". Suppose Tolkien and Lewis collaborated on names?
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 10, 2004, 02:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: clinton, utah
Posts: 244
Julie,
As you probably know they were very good friends and met with a couple of others every week to talk about their writings and ideas. C. S. Lewis stated that some of his ideas came from those discuaiions whereas Tolkein brought his ideas to the group and then improved them. Have you read C.S.Lewis non=fiction? I highly reccommend them.
To show my age I remember when LOTR first hit the U.S. and being a member of the TSA (Tolkein Society of America) with Dick Plotz as the first president.
So much for nostalgia and old age, Back to officiating....Where were we anyway????
__________________
Ron
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1