|
|||
Must have.
It is very worth it. The articles are excellent, they deal with things that are vital to officiating. Some here might tell you that there are things they do not like about the magazine. But they interview some of the best referees in the country in all the major sports. They give insight on moving up and philosophy. They give case plays on specific areas on the rules. They have information you cannot get anywhere else in the world of officiating. And if you do HS in America, the NF has plenty of publications at your disposal that you can get a discounted rates if you are a NASO member. It is the best overall resource for officials that I can think of. I do not know too many officials that are serious about officiating that do not get this publication or have not at some point of their career.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Well worth it. Even though I only officiate one sport (basketball) which is only given 10-15 pages per issue, it's well worth it. I don't agree with everything that's written, but that's OK because it makes me think and I find most of it very useful.
Z |
|
|||
I have received great value from the magazine. It is truly worth subscribing too. I emjoy learning about the world of officiating and news from other areas as well as reading about other sports. I am not so sure about NASO. Was a member for one year but not sure at the HS level if there was a lot of value. But definetly get it, if you are not sure they will usually send one free issue to check it out.
__________________
Ron |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
foulbuster |
|
|||
Officiating is a business.
Some will disagree with me. But anytime you take money for a service, have a schedule within for that project that you take money for, anything you do is an investment. Investing in Referee Magazine or NASO or what kind of shoes you buy is all apart of that business. Just like anything else you spend your money on, there are going to be pros and cons to what you invest. This is not different than the debates we have had over belted pants or bletless pants, Honigs vs +POS or Officiating.com vs McGriffs. There is going to be ups and downs to all of it. I would suggest if you have not subscribed to NASO or Referee Magazine, do for a year. If it does not work for you, drop it. For a current member and someone that has been a member for probably 6 years or so, I would not live without it. When the new NF and NCAA Rules come out, Referee Magazine is often the first to have articles about them in all the sports they cover. I also like the fact that they have information on official's abuse and laws that affect officating in specific states and around the world. You also get insight on what it takes to move up and what other states are doing to make officiating better around the country and the world. I can work two games in basketball and one weekend in football and I have paid for the membership and have money left over.
If it is worth it to you, pay for it. If it is not, do not pay for it. If you have a friend that had a bad problem with NASO, then if you trust them enough, listen to them. If I get sued or if I get hurt, it is not going to be my friends that help me with the situations that NASO helps with. It really comes down to if money that you are already going to make is worth investing, rather than holding your money and having to come out of your own money to pay for you loss or get a lawyer. I hate all the money I pay in car insurance, but when I had an accident, it was worth it then. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Game fee protection.
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
__________________
foulbuster |
|
|||
Thnaks for the insights and views on my post. Bart, are you saying that NASO will help with legal issues,(and I am sure that I as an official need to be doing my part for safety of the player). I thought they mainly just carried insurance which I have through USSF from my soccer and my stae dues throguh basketball. I guess I will re read the ad I got in the mail a couple of days ago.
__________________
Ron |
|
|||
Legal insurance.
rcwilco,
Legal issues is one of the things the insurance covers. The NF has some similar coverage, but that only applies to NF games, not rec. leagues or I do not think NCAA games anyone might do. Not even sure summer ball is covered by this (NF coverage). I have never known anyone that has ever had to use the NF coverage, but I know some that have used the NASO coverage for the game-fee part of coverage. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bart Tyson
Quote:
|
|
|||
The NASO game fee insurance program is a separate package that I didn't think was worthwhile. If you have games booked well into the future and suffer an injury, it might be worthwhile. But I'm a 1-sport official in an area where officiating contracts are signed shortly before the season, so I didn't think the coverage was worth the premium.
I do like the NASO's liability coverage. It covers you for pretty much any type of organized game, as opposed the the coverage provided by our state association. And I enjoy the magazine, too. |
Bookmarks |
|
|