The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 19, 2003, 05:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,217
I am really trying

to understand the significance of a rule that zsome wish to enforce here. We have schools with limited athletic budgets. They try to give as many kids as possible some HS playing time. JV coach is varsity assistant coach - this is the most important job he has. These games really count.

Now we have this JV game. There is usually a reason that the JV head coach is the varsity assistant, and the JV assistant is the JV assistant with no varsity duties of significance. JV ead coach leaves, 9 times out of 10 that means his kids are getting a lower level coach. why do we punish them further by constraining that coach to a seatbelt because he can't be the "head coach." There is a reason to restrict who stands, but once again, the NFHS rulebook is not meant to be used in this manner to handle these kind of situations. Please allow a little judgment and common sense to come into play.

Who have you harmed, and in what specific way, if you allow the assistant to become the head coach and stand?
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1