The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 14, 2003, 11:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 329
Send a message via Yahoo to drinkeii
Hi - One more - Just wanted to confirm my idea.

A1 is dribbling downcourt, with B1 in front of them, running sideways in front of them, having never established a legal guarding position. A1 reaches out and pushes B1, clearly displacing them from their current movement. Call?

My presumption is PC or No-Call, depending on the severity of the push and displacement. Some people have said that it can't be PC, because B1 never obtained a LGP. My premise it is a foul to reach out and push someone, regardless of who or where, therefore, since it is a foul, and it is by the dribbler, it is a PC.

Thanks in advance!

Dave Rinke
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 14, 2003, 11:37pm
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,048
Quote:
Originally posted by drinkeii
Hi - One more - Just wanted to confirm my idea.

A1 is dribbling downcourt, with B1 in front of them, running sideways in front of them, having never established a legal guarding position. A1 reaches out and pushes B1, clearly displacing them from their current movement. Call?

My presumption is PC or No-Call, depending on the severity of the push and displacement. Some people have said that it can't be PC, because B1 never obtained a LGP. My premise it is a foul to reach out and push someone, regardless of who or where, therefore, since it is a foul, and it is by the dribbler, it is a PC.

Thanks in advance!

Dave Rinke

This is a pushing foul by A1. Since A1 was in control of the ball at the time of the foul, A1's foul is a player control foul. From the description of your play I would speculate that B1 had already obtained/established a legal guarding postion against A1.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 14, 2003, 11:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 329
Send a message via Yahoo to drinkeii
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by drinkeii
Hi - One more - Just wanted to confirm my idea.

A1 is dribbling downcourt, with B1 in front of them, running sideways in front of them, having never established a legal guarding position. A1 reaches out and pushes B1, clearly displacing them from their current movement. Call?

My presumption is PC or No-Call, depending on the severity of the push and displacement. Some people have said that it can't be PC, because B1 never obtained a LGP. My premise it is a foul to reach out and push someone, regardless of who or where, therefore, since it is a foul, and it is by the dribbler, it is a PC.

Thanks in advance!

Dave Rinke

This is a pushing foul by A1. Since A1 was in control of the ball at the time of the foul, A1's foul is a player control foul. From the description of your play I would speculate that B1 had already obtained/established a legal guarding postion against A1.


No - they had never met the requirements to establish a LGP... they were running along side A1 at the time, and maybe cut a little in front, but never planted 2 feet initially, and never made any contact with A1 at any time, except for when A1's hand came out and pushed them. No change to the call, correct? Still PC by your description?
__________________
David A. Rinke II
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 14, 2003, 11:50pm
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,048
Quote:
Originally posted by drinkeii
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Quote:
Originally posted by drinkeii
Hi - One more - Just wanted to confirm my idea.

A1 is dribbling downcourt, with B1 in front of them, running sideways in front of them, having never established a legal guarding position. A1 reaches out and pushes B1, clearly displacing them from their current movement. Call?

My presumption is PC or No-Call, depending on the severity of the push and displacement. Some people have said that it can't be PC, because B1 never obtained a LGP. My premise it is a foul to reach out and push someone, regardless of who or where, therefore, since it is a foul, and it is by the dribbler, it is a PC.

Thanks in advance!

Dave Rinke

This is a pushing foul by A1. Since A1 was in control of the ball at the time of the foul, A1's foul is a player control foul. From the description of your play I would speculate that B1 had already obtained/established a legal guarding postion against A1.


No - they had never met the requirements to establish a LGP... they were running along side A1 at the time, and maybe cut a little in front, but never planted 2 feet initially, and never made any contact with A1 at any time, except for when A1's hand came out and pushed them. No change to the call, correct? Still PC by your description?

I am having trouble understanding your original post. How many players are involved? Just A1 and B1, or are there more Team A players involved?

If A1 is dribbling in a straight line and B1 is directly in front of A1 (and this is how I am envisioning your description), then it would be very dificult to say that B1 is not guarding A1. Regardless, the foul is on A1 and it is a player control foul for the reasons I have already stated.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 14, 2003, 11:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,628
I'm asking myself "who initiated the contact?".

B1 has the right to be running near A1, so long as he does not contact A1.

A1 pushing B1 out of his path is clearly a PC foul, I think. Unless I'm missing something, here.
__________________
HOMER: Just gimme my gun.
CLERK: Hold on, the law requires a five-day waiting period; we've got run a background check...
HOMER: Five days???? But I'm mad NOW!!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 15, 2003, 12:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 329
Send a message via Yahoo to drinkeii
Quote:
Originally posted by canuckrefguy
I'm asking myself "who initiated the contact?".

B1 has the right to be running near A1, so long as he does not contact A1.

A1 pushing B1 out of his path is clearly a PC foul, I think. Unless I'm missing something, here.

Ya, I think that is the confusion - B1 is guarding A1, but never established a LGP (2 feet on the floor inbounds, facing the player, between them and the basket) - they were attempting to get in front of them or stay in front of them, but never established a position. A1, while running down the court, initiated the contact on B1 (who could have been guarding him or could have just been running in the area in front of A1) by reaching out away from his body and pushing B1, causing B1 to move in a different direction from their initial movement. B1 was attempting to guard A1, but for purposes of block/charge calls, B1 had never established a LGP - the play which generated this situation was in transition, just over the half court line.

And no other A or B players were involved - everyone else was in transition, and no one was near those two, since it was near one side of the court.
__________________
David A. Rinke II
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 15, 2003, 12:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Whether B1 ever had LGP or not is of no consequence if A1 pushes him. B1 is still entitled to his space on the floor.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 15, 2003, 02:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,628
You nailed it. Thanks!
__________________
HOMER: Just gimme my gun.
CLERK: Hold on, the law requires a five-day waiting period; we've got run a background check...
HOMER: Five days???? But I'm mad NOW!!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 15, 2003, 08:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 263
Unhappy



Ya, I think that is the confusion - B1 is guarding A1, but never established a LGP (2 feet on the floor inbounds, facing the player, between them and the basket)

You can have a legal guarding position without this. You can even be moving and have a legal guarding position.
__________________
Nature bats last!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 15, 2003, 10:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
LGP doesn't apply in this situation, as Tony said. You have to see the putting out of the arm as the foul. LGP only really applies to block/charge where there's someone bodily running into someone else.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 15, 2003, 11:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 37
Send a message via Yahoo to rob.wilson
Talking

Handcheck?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1