I don't understand the difference between AR 13 and AR 14 on page 54 of the rulebook. Can somebody help me out. In AR 13, A1 and A2 are both injured or bleeding. Team A calls a TO and both A1 and A2 are allowed to continue playing after the TO.

In AR 14, A1 is injured and B1 is bleeding. Team B calls TO and after the TO, A1 is NOT allowed to continue in the game.

Can somebody tell me what the difference is between these two cases? :confused:

[Edited by ChuckElias on Nov 26th, 2003 at 10:53 AM]

Reread the cases (are you using this year's book?):

AR13 -- A1 and A2 (teammates) are injured -- one TO allows both to remain (a team need not take a TO for each).

AR14 -- A1 is the only one injured, but B (the other team) takes the TO. The team of the injured player must take a TO to "buy" A1's way back into the game.

Ah! I am using this year's book, but read it too fast. (I've edited my original post to properly reflect the AR, even tho it makes me look stupider than usual :o ) So that answers one question, thank you; but raises another. The reason I asked the question in the first place was due to this test question:

The answer is YES! I had originally thought that AR 13 covered it (since only one team took a TO in that case), but now see that AR 13 doesn't apply, b/c it is talking about teammates. This question deals with opponents.

Any other thoughts, Bob?

Yes -- I've thought the test answer is incorrect.

We discussed it here a few weeks ago.

If B1's shirt is soaked with A1's blood, does B still need to buy his return with a TO?

Yes -- I've thought the test answer is incorrect.

We discussed it here a few weeks ago.[/B][/QUOTE]
Any confirmation from NCAA that the test answer is incorrect? And how did I miss that thread? You know where it is?

Any confirmation from NCAA that the test answer is incorrect? And how did I miss that thread? You know where it is? [/B][/QUOTE]

No, but if you write Barb Jacobs you might get an answer.

Don't know.

No.