![]() |
I am going to have a 20-25 point lead before my starters are done, in all likelihood. 25 is not out of the question if we jump our opponents early in the game. I have come back from 16, 17, and 19 down in one quarter playing running clock when a team backed off, so 25 is not as big a lead as it may seem to you.
Now I start leaning on my second string who maybe doesn't get that much opportunity for extended run. They have been giving me some fill-in minutes in the second and third quarter (say they normally get 4 per quarter) in a normal game. But my second string is pretty good, and simultaneously my opponents start going to their even weaker second string, and now the lead is 40, and I am just getting the bottom of my bench in the game. It's easy when you don't coach a team day-in and day-out to judge what you are seeing and think we are crazy. And of course some of us are, myself included at times. But sometimes what makes sense to you isn't going to be what makes sense to a coach dealing with specific team issues. |
Quote:
Our season finally kicked off here and I have reffed 4 games. 1 jv varsity girl night and 1 jv varsity boys night. In 3 of those 4 our new mercy rule did or could have kicked in. (could have b/c they were non-league pre-season games and both coaches decided not to use the rule at one game.) Here is how the rule is here for military schools in Japan and International school in Tokyo: 1. running clock at 40 points-stays running unless spread drops to 25. 2. Clock only stops for injuries and time-outs by the losing team. 3. Winning team must sub key players with non-starters 4. No man advantage fast breaks and no 3 pointers by the winning team. I like the theory behind numbers 3 and 4 but don't like the wording. What is a key player? What if team has less than 9 eligible players? In addition the rule leaves no enforcement. What is the ref supposed to do if the winning team doesnot sub? Or a player goes on a fast break? Personnaly I felt 3 and 4 should be suggestions for fair play and not rules without any enforcement anyway. I asked our assignor what to do if the team does not comply and he said I should just remind the coach of the rule and if they still don't comply send a letter to the AD/principal. This seams a lot more reasonble then throwing around T's or blowing dead a play because a team is on a fast break. I still wish 3 and 4 were guidlines from a superintendent and not a rule. --Here in Japan we don't have a state association so the league votes on any changes. From what I heard the 2 coaches I reffed on the boys game were the only 2 to vote against it. The coach from the strong team voted against it because he thought it might lead to teams hammering it in to force a mercy rule. The coach from the weaker school was against it for the same reason-and accepts there might be some lopsided scores but wants the playing time for his players to prep for their end of season tourney with other schools that are smaller and the games are more competitive. (we have a wide discrepency of schools sizes and here and teams playing each other) [Edited by oc on Nov 21st, 2003 at 01:35 AM] |
I don't like #4 at all. If I am subbing, you have to let my subs play. Again, this might be one of their only chances to do their thing. If I have a shooter, she should shoot. If we play a running game, I want my subs to run.
I am NOT a fan of any style of play restrictions. The only thing I would alter is if we pressed normally, I wouldn't with a big lead. But we will brreak and we will shoot threes, just like always. You can't stop playing your game. |
Quote:
Player: Tell that to the guy that sits on the bench as the twelveth man, and rarely sees any action...he might love to get in the game just to show his girlfriend and parents that he can actually particiapate and have fun doing it. Fans: Tell that to the parent that shows up night after night only to see their kid get in a couple minutes playing time in some mop up action...and now they're going to take away that precious mop up time. Remember, that parent probably cares more about their kid playing than the outcome of the game. Coaches: Tell that to the Coach that can now play the scrubs with some degree of comfort both in winning and in getting the dudes some PT. Refs: Tell that to the official that just got his/her first Varsity game...only to have it ended early. Sure, generally you may be correct in saying most people don't like blowouts...but saying they "aren't fun for ANYBODY" may be a stretch, IMO. NOTE: We should remember also that this is High School Basketball...not the PROS or College ball. The athletic program is an extension of the classroom...don't punish the less gifted athletes with even less playing time because some of their peers happen to be more gifted...would you take away reading time in the classroom because some kids were getting their assignments done quicker or better? ;) RD |
Great points
My son played HS lacrosse last year on a senior-laden team. I went to every game, saw him play in four, all predicatably were blow-outs. Got three shots on goal, one assist, all during "garbage time." Love those blow-outs!
|
In my experience in Michigan, where we've had a mercy rule on and off for four years, the running clock rule often causes the winning coach to substitute earlier, to avoid the running clock. The gets the subs more time and keeps the game more competitive. Wednesday night, for example, the winning team was up 30 early in the 3rd when the coach went to the 2nd string. The 4th string played the entire 4th quarter, and it ended up a 10-point game.
Coaches, how often do you find yourself in a 40-point game? These are extreme mismatches, and no one, including the winning team and substitutes, enjoys the fourth quarter of these games. |
Quote:
My guess is he feels like my son in varsity lacrosse, who was really happy about finally getting to play. He watched about 8 games before he saw the field. That's a lot of practice time and ball fetching during games for very little run - you really want the run that you get. He hoped for blowouts and once he was in, didn't care what the score was. He played his butt off like it was 0-0, as did every other sophomore who had waited all year to play. They knew the teams that were likely to be blowout games and just wanted it to get ugly early so he could get more time! |
Quote:
|
Easy to judge form afar
Quote:
In HS, you often have a few players who can't play anywhere near the level of your starters. When they are seniors, they'll be starting, but right now, they aren't at that level. So they see a lot of pine time. Every HS coach I talk to has the same issue, and all seem to handle it the same way. |
Quote:
totally agree with you. I forgot to add their is also a no press rule and no man defenses. The no pressing makes sense and I think any coach that presses up that much needs to get dragged into the principal's office. But the no fast break and no three's takes away the subs chance to play ball. --Back when I coached my biggest loss ever was by about 40. The other coach played his bench most of the second half -never pressed and one of the bench guys started hitting 3's like crazy. I have no problem with that. The kid got his chance to show his stuff and probably earned his way up from the third string to second or higher in that game. |
You sound like you were at the IACAO Clinic
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Peace |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54pm. |