The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2003, 05:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,474
Re: Why not a third opinion

Quote:
Originally posted by Hawks Coach
I can't see going with the common foul when one ref has given the intentionhal foul signal. That is inviting even more trouble.

I think that going wih the intentional as the overriding foul is the best way to deal with this situation unless you really think you need the multple foul scenario. You will give shots and ball, not a bad outcome for the fouled team, and you avoid the bizarre, not a bad outcome for the officiating team.
I like that... basically ignore the first because of its minor nature and penalize the second, more serious foul.

Nice, nice. Much easier to sell than ignoring the serious foul. Thanx!
__________________
"There are no superstar calls. We don't root for certain teams. We don't cheat. But sometimes we just miss calls." - Joe Crawford
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1