The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Experimental thirty second substitution rule., (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/10620-experimental-thirty-second-substitution-rule.html)

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Tue Oct 28, 2003 01:05pm

Can someone please tell which state, Indiana or Illinois, is not using the thirty second rule for substitutions for disqualification? Is the rule is only for players that have become disqualified (five fouls or flagrant foul) or does it also apply to players that are injured (blood rule included) and players that have been discovered playing while wearing jewelry or other illegal equipment?

Indy_Ref Tue Oct 28, 2003 01:21pm

In Indiana...
 
We are abiding buy the rule...except there will be NO horn after the 30 seconds, only one after 20.

JRutledge Tue Oct 28, 2003 01:31pm

We are using the "rulebook way" this year. I guess you can only have an experiemental rule for so many years and we hit the limit. I really wish they would use the rule, because it made life so much easier. I was at first against this rule (experimental), but you would be surprised how much coaches did not waste time and make a substitution. Now we go back to the same dance and pony show that will happen during the 30 seconds to replace a DQ'd player.

Peace

mick Tue Oct 28, 2003 01:36pm

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
I was at first against this rule (experimental), but you would be surprised how much coaches did not waste time and make a substitution. Now we go back to the same dance and pony show that will happen during the 30 seconds to replace a DQ'd player.

Peace

Yes,Rut; a monster was created!

4 times this year the coach spent all 30 seconds replacing a player. I do not remember this happening before the clarification.

Oh, well, at least they're reading some selections in the book. :rolleyes:

mick

rainmaker Tue Oct 28, 2003 01:56pm

Quote:

Originally posted by mick
Oh, well, at least they're reading some selections in the book. :rolleyes:
I don't know if this is good, mick. "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing," remember.

mick Tue Oct 28, 2003 02:00pm

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:

Originally posted by mick
Oh, well, at least they're reading some selections in the book. :rolleyes:
I don't know if this is good, mick. "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing," remember.


A little knowledge is also a 'start'. :)

rainmaker Tue Oct 28, 2003 02:06pm

Quote:

Originally posted by mick
Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:

Originally posted by mick
Oh, well, at least they're reading some selections in the book. :rolleyes:
I don't know if this is good, mick. "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing," remember.


A little knowledge is also a 'start'. :)

Man, you are right up there with Alexander Pope! Do you have a book coming out anytime soon?

mick Tue Oct 28, 2003 02:21pm

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker

Man, you are right up there with Alexander Pope! Do you have a book coming out anytime soon?

Uh, don't think so Jewel, ...left-handed, ya know. ;)

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Tue Oct 28, 2003 11:39pm

Thank you ladies and germs (I mean gentlemen) for your prompt responses.

MTD, Sr.

mick Wed Oct 29, 2003 07:13am

Quote:

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Thank you ladies and germs (I mean gentlemen) for your prompt responses.

MTD, Sr.

Germs ???

oatmealqueen Wed Oct 29, 2003 08:24pm

Quote:

Originally posted by mick
Quote:

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Thank you ladies and germs (I mean gentlemen) for your prompt responses.

MTD, Sr.

Germs ???


Mick, I believe that some golden age TV show host (like Milton Berle, or Sid Caeser) used to start his monologue by saying "Hello ladies and germs".
Can't remember who, however.

Jurassic Referee Wed Oct 29, 2003 08:35pm

Quote:

Originally posted by oatmealqueen
[/B]
Mick, I believe that some golden age TV show host (like Milton Berle, or Sid Caeser) used to start his monologue by saying "Hello ladies and germs".
Can't remember who, however.
[/B][/QUOTE]'Twas Uncle Milty!

mick Wed Oct 29, 2003 08:39pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:

Originally posted by oatmealqueen
Mick, I believe that some golden age TV show host (like Milton Berle, or Sid Caeser) used to start his monologue by saying "Hello ladies and germs".
Can't remember who, however.
[/B]
'Twas Uncle Milty! [/B][/QUOTE]

Thanks Ms Referee and Mr. Birthday,
I remember now. I did hear it on TV.
1955????
It used to be humor. ;)

rainmaker Thu Oct 30, 2003 01:03am

Quote:

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Can someone please tell which state, Indiana or Illinois, is not using the thirty second rule for substitutions for disqualification? Is the rule is only for players that have become disqualified (five fouls or flagrant foul) or does it also apply to players that are injured (blood rule included) and players that have been discovered playing while wearing jewelry or other illegal equipment?
Okay, I'm lost. What are we discussing here?

Jurassic Referee Thu Oct 30, 2003 03:00am

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Can someone please tell which state, Indiana or Illinois, is not using the thirty second rule for substitutions for disqualification? Is the rule is only for players that have become disqualified (five fouls or flagrant foul) or does it also apply to players that are injured (blood rule included) and players that have been discovered playing while wearing jewelry or other illegal equipment?
Okay, I'm lost. What are we discussing here?


Last year, Illinois used an experimental NFHS rule that basically said that if coaches had to substitute for disqualified players, they had to make that substitution immediately, and did not get 30 seconds to do so. Mark was wondering if the "immediate - no 30 seconds to substitute" rule also applied to players that were directed by an official to leave the game because of injury or wearing jewelry. Mark's question remained unanswered because some nameless miscreant got the thread off-track by making an "Alexander Pope" reference. Maybe someone from Illinois can finish answering the question for Mark.

ChuckElias Thu Oct 30, 2003 10:36am

Since when does Pope Alexander have any juridisction over Fed rulings? :confused:

rainmaker Thu Oct 30, 2003 11:24am

Quote:

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Can someone please tell which state, Indiana or Illinois, is not using the thirty second rule for substitutions for disqualification? Is the rule is only for players that have become disqualified (five fouls or flagrant foul) or does it also apply to players that are injured (blood rule included) and players that have been discovered playing while wearing jewelry or other illegal equipment?
Okay, I'm lost. What are we discussing here?


Last year, Illinois used an experimental NFHS rule that basically said that if coaches had to substitute for disqualified players, they had to make that substitution immediately, and did not get 30 seconds to do so. Mark was wondering if the "immediate - no 30 seconds to substitute" rule also applied to players that were directed by an official to leave the game because of injury or wearing jewelry. Mark's question remained unanswered because some nameless miscreant got the thread off-track...

Oooooo, I get to be a nameless miscreant??? What fun!

Dan, do I get points for that?

rockyroad Thu Oct 30, 2003 05:36pm

Quote:

Originally posted by ChuckElias
Since when does Pope Alexander have any juridisction over Fed rulings? :confused:
O h for crying out loud Chuck...read the NEWEST Fed clarification, and you will see that they CLEARLY state that all final rulings will come from Pope Alexander... now if we can only get those darn coaches to read that clarification...

And Juulie, I think the nameless miscreant was the same ethnic group Jurassic wanted to go out and kick the other day...

ChuckElias Thu Oct 30, 2003 06:03pm

Quote:

Originally posted by rockyroad
read the NEWEST Fed clarification, and you will see that they CLEARLY state that all final rulings will come from Pope Alexander...
Well, I'll be sending an email to Barb Jacobs to clarify the clarification!

Jurassic Referee Thu Oct 30, 2003 06:54pm

Quote:

Originally posted by rockyroad

And Juulie, I think the nameless miscreant was the same ethnic group Jurassic wanted to go out and kick the other day... [/B]
Geeze, don't start on that. Can't even take a kick at Mick anymore. Takes all the fun out of life,

Why do ya think I left that Pope Alexander thing completely alone? :D

Btw, I allus thought that the Nameless Miscreants was a heavy metal group out of Portland..... and Juulie was Third Bimbo in that group.

Jurassic Referee Thu Oct 30, 2003 06:58pm

Quote:

Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:

Originally posted by rockyroad
read the NEWEST Fed clarification, and you will see that they CLEARLY state that all final rulings will come from Pope Alexander...
Well, I'll be sending an email to Barb Jacobs to clarify the clarification!

Hell with that! I'm sending an e-mail to Barb Brady.

If <i>Da Queen</i> can't straighten this out, <b>no one</b> can!

rainmaker Thu Oct 30, 2003 08:14pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:

Originally posted by rockyroad

And Juulie, I think the nameless miscreant was the same ethnic group Jurassic wanted to go out and kick the other day...
Geeze, don't start on that. Can't even take a kick at Mick anymore. Takes all the fun out of life,

Why do ya think I left that Pope Alexander thing completely alone? :D

Btw, I allus thought that the Nameless Miscreants was a heavy metal group out of Portland..... and Juulie was Third Bimbo in that group. [/B]
No, not THIRD Bimbo. I have never taken any bimbo lessons in my life, and don't want anyone to hear me play it!

ChuckElias Thu Oct 30, 2003 08:24pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
I'm sending an e-mail to Barb Brady.
Is that Officer Barbrady, of South Park fame?

http://www.southparkspot.com/southpic/slug2.jpg

Dan_ref Thu Oct 30, 2003 08:29pm

Quote:

Originally posted by rockyroad
Quote:

Originally posted by ChuckElias
Since when does Pope Alexander have any juridisction over Fed rulings? :confused:
O h for crying out loud Chuck...read the NEWEST Fed clarification, and you will see that they CLEARLY state that all final rulings will come from Pope Alexander... now if we can only get those darn coaches to read that clarification...

Yeah sure, Pope Alexander can make proclamations until chickens have lips but if you don't call it the way the local Bishops want it called you are NOT getting a good schedule.

Quote:

Originally posted by Anonymous Reprobate

Oooooo, I get to be a nameless miscreant??? What fun!

Dan, do I get points for that?
Sorry, no, you would only get points if you DIDN't enjoy it.

Dan_ref Thu Oct 30, 2003 08:30pm

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:

Originally posted by rockyroad

And Juulie, I think the nameless miscreant was the same ethnic group Jurassic wanted to go out and kick the other day...
Geeze, don't start on that. Can't even take a kick at Mick anymore. Takes all the fun out of life,

Why do ya think I left that Pope Alexander thing completely alone? :D

Btw, I allus thought that the Nameless Miscreants was a heavy metal group out of Portland..... and Juulie was Third Bimbo in that group.
No, not THIRD Bimbo. I have never taken any bimbo lessons in my life, and don't want anyone to hear me play it! [/B]
Most good bimbos never take lessons. They just kinda come by it naturally.

:p

ChuckElias Thu Oct 30, 2003 08:36pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_ref
Most good bimbos never take lessons. They just kinda come by it naturally.

:p

And unlike unnamed miscreants, good bimbos do get points for enjoying it! :eek:

rainmaker Thu Oct 30, 2003 11:33pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_ref
Most good bimbos never take lessons. They just kinda come by it naturally.:p
Okay, well that lets me out, then. I'm not a natural blonde, and my brain is actually quite functional.

But I am confused about one thing. I thought guys enjoyed being miscreants. If it's not fun, why do so many of them ...

Never mind. I don't like where that sentence is heading.

mick Thu Oct 30, 2003 11:38pm

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker

Okay, well that lets me out, then. I'm not a natural blonde, and my brain is actually quite functional.

But I am confused about one thing. I thought guys enjoyed being miscreants. If it's not fun, why do so many of them ...

Never mind. I don't like where that sentence is heading.

I feel your pain, but I've never really done one.
mick

Jurassic Referee Fri Oct 31, 2003 01:06am

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
[/B]
But I am confused about one thing. I thought guys enjoyed being miscreants. If it's not fun, why do so many of them ...

[/B][/QUOTE]It's in their genes (sp?).

dblref Fri Oct 31, 2003 06:58am

Quote:

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
But I am confused about one thing. I thought guys enjoyed being miscreants. If it's not fun, why do so many of them ...

[/B]
It's in their genes (sp?). [/B][/QUOTE]

It's in their "jeans", not "genes".

Tim Roden Fri Oct 31, 2003 01:34pm

funny story from two years ago here in Texas. A game I was working, we had a 30 second substitution situation and after 20 a horn sounded. Not know that it was a warning horn, the my partner proceded to call a technical foul. Then the timer corrected the official. Substitute came immediatly and all was well. Now it is in the rule book, hopefully no more embarrasing false technical fouls.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Sun Nov 02, 2003 04:08pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Can someone please tell which state, Indiana or Illinois, is not using the thirty second rule for substitutions for disqualification? Is the rule is only for players that have become disqualified (five fouls or flagrant foul) or does it also apply to players that are injured (blood rule included) and players that have been discovered playing while wearing jewelry or other illegal equipment?
Okay, I'm lost. What are we discussing here?


Last year, Illinois used an experimental NFHS rule that basically said that if coaches had to substitute for disqualified players, they had to make that substitution immediately, and did not get 30 seconds to do so. Mark was wondering if the "immediate - no 30 seconds to substitute" rule also applied to players that were directed by an official to leave the game because of injury or wearing jewelry. Mark's question remained unanswered because some nameless miscreant got the thread off-track by making an "Alexander Pope" reference. Maybe someone from Illinois can finish answering the question for Mark.


Thank you Jurassic Referee.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Sun Nov 02, 2003 04:13pm

"Sports do not build character. They reveal it." -- Heywood Hale Broun, sportswriter

Heywood, Jr., or Heywood, Sr.?

JRutledge Sun Nov 02, 2003 09:48pm

Yes, it applied there too.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Jurassic Referee

Last year, Illinois used an experimental NFHS rule that basically said that if coaches had to substitute for disqualified players, they had to make that substitution immediately, and did not get 30 seconds to do so. Mark was wondering if the "immediate - no 30 seconds to substitute" rule also applied to players that were directed by an official to leave the game because of injury or wearing jewelry. Mark's question remained unanswered because some nameless miscreant got the thread off-track by making an "Alexander Pope" reference. Maybe someone from Illinois can finish answering the question for Mark.


It applied to all situations that the 30 seconds would be used for a substitutions under the rules. So yes, it did apply to the injured player or player with jewelry.

Peace

ChuckElias Mon Nov 03, 2003 09:29am

Quote:

Originally posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Heywood, Jr., or Heywood, Sr.?
No idea, Mark. I didn't even know there were two of them.
__________________________________________________ _________

I had assumed that Dan would do a google search to clear this up, but since he didn't, I did. Apparently Heywood Hale Broun was neither Sr nor Jr. He was distinguished from his father (Heywood Broun) by his middle name, which also happened to be his mother's maiden name.

http://www.americansportscasters.com/broun.html

[Edited by ChuckElias on Nov 3rd, 2003 at 10:27 AM]


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1