Team Control Player Control Difference ...
 

Yesterday a rookie official asked me a very high level question and I “stumbled” through an answer.

Here's the email clarification that I sent him today.

How did I do?

Question: What is the practical difference between a team control foul and a player control foul.

A team control foul is a common foul committed by a member of the team that has team control (holding, dribbling, passing).

A player control foul is a common foul committed by a player while he/she is in control of the ball (holding, dribbling) OR by an airborne shooter.

Remember that an airborne shooter, after the ball has been released on a shot (try) is not a team member in control (holding or dribbling), but can still be charged with a player control foul.

No team control during a try (shot).

Thus all player control fouls are not necessarily also team control fouls.

Because the difference is more academic than practical, we now use the same signal (back of the head) for both types of fouls, whereas we used two different signals (back of head and fist punch) a few years ago before the team control signal was changed.

Even before the recent signal change, many officials had been incorrectly using a fist punch for player control fouls, favoring the incorrect fist punch over the correct back of the head, thinking that the fist punch was a “stronger signal”.

Thus, you will often see older veterans incorrectly using the old team control fist punch for many “offensive type” fouls, old dog, new tricks.

Also keep in mind that a team control foul is also a common foul committed by a member of the throwin team from the start of the throwin until player control is obtained inbounds.

Question: What is the practical difference between a team control foul and a player control foul?

Answer: Nothing


Fixed it for ya! :)

For a veteran such as yourself, the difference used to be that a goal could be scored on a player control foul if the try had been released prior to contact and the foul was therefore by an airborne shooter, while a team control foul always prevented any score. Of course that rule changed several years ago. College even changed it.

No more counting a goal and then going to the opposite end for bonus FTs.

Best not to confuse the rookies with this though.

Befuddled Coaches ...
 

Leaving both coaches befuddled. Do they thank us, yell at us, or just sit down and be quiet (no standing in a coaching box back then)?

That must have been before my time. When I started in 2015, there were still two different signals, but no points could be scored or free throws attempted on either a team or player control foul. At least NCAAW and NBA rules are consistent and call both types of fouls offensive fouls, because it is the offense that commits them.

Ancient Times ...
 

For NFHS, it was ancient times, when we used whistles with peas, had several jump balls in every game in three different jump ball circles, gave dribblers a new five second count if they passed the 28 foot hash mark, and rarely allowed coaches to stand up.

"Count the basket" player control foul on one end, then walk down to the other end to shoot bonus free throws.

The good ole days?

I'm vaguely remembering this now. Was it in the rule to shoot FTs for any PC (or TC) foul if the bonus was in effect? Or just ones that occurred after the try had been released?

Try Released ...
 

This.

Practical ...
 

Agree. Practical was poor word choice.

Bottom line: All player control fouls are not necessarily also team control fouls.

and vice versa.

Used to be a difference, but now in both the throw-in and FT sections the phrases "PC foul" and TC foul" are used one right after the other to show that they have the same penalty.

But There Are Five Team Fouls ...
 

No free throws.

Vis-à-vis ...
 

All team control fouls are not necessarily also player control fouls.

4-19-7: A team-control foul is a common foul committed ... by a member of the throw-in team from the start of the throw-in until player control is obtained inbounds.

... and, of course, the most common type of team control foul we call, illegal screens.

I'm pretty sure that when I started working HS ball, we were using the current player control foul rule. So no FT, even the try had been released by the shooter. But in NCAA, we still used the old rule. So having said that. . .

I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but the whole reason that you could shoot the FTs in this situation is that it was NOT a player control foul. Once the shooter released the ball, there was no player control. So it was a charge in a loose-ball situation. But not a player control foul.

I do not recall that rule. I do recall that if A2 set an illegal screen, B could shoot FTs if B was in the bonus.

They could have combined the categories when they went to the "no FTs for a TC foul" rule a dozen or so years ago.

Give That Man A Cigar ...
 

Bingo.

Ancient Times ...
 

It was definitely much more than a dozen years ago when we stopped (NFHS) shooting bonus free throws (down on the other end of the court) for "charges" in which the ball had already been released (where the basket could actually count if the ball went in the basket).

It was way back in ancient times, possibly thirty-plus, maybe thirty-five-plus, years ago, way back in the Holocene geological epoch.

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/98/4c/62/9...rehistoric.jpg

Give me an example when a PCF is not TCF?

MTD, Sr.

Airborne shooter.

Ball Released ...
 

... who has released the ball for a try.

Isn't that redundant?

Can you give an example of an Airborne Shooter who has not released the ball? (Hint: The answer is "no".)

Continuous Motion ...
 

A ball handler becomes airborne (ball comes to rest in the player’s hands) and starts his continuous trying motion. The trying motion includes arm, foot or body movements used by the player when throwing the ball at his basket. All of this before the ball is released on a try. The player becomes an airborne shooter when both feet have left the floor and are off the ground.

Maybe he didn't release the ball because an opponent "clamped down" on his wrist?

Maybe he quite doesn't fit the official definition (ball released) of a NFHS "airborne shooter", but he certainly is airborne, and he certainly is in the act of shooting, thus he's a generic airborne shooter.

Airborne Shooter ...
 

He's a shooter, and he's airborne, but he's not an airborne shooter.

4-1-1:An airborne shooter is a player who has released the ball on a try for a goal or has tapped the ball and has not returned to the floor.

Let's just say that he is a shooter that's airborne.

Don’t Give Up, I Believe In You All …
 

… a person’s a person, no matter how small.

https://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.D...=Api&P=0&h=180

It was once that way, but the progression, I believe, was slightly different.

Early on....it was as you said, the shot would count if released prior to contact. Yes TCFs prevented a score, but the offended team got FTs if in the bonus.

At some point, the PCF was changes to not shoot FTs regardless of the timing of the foul relative to the release. TCF's were still subject to FTs if in the bonus.

Later, the TCF was changed to match the PCF (no FTs).