Smile, You're On Candid Camera ...
Quote:
Wait? Is this Candid Camera? C'mon Raymond. Are we on Candid Camera? Where's the camera? Is it the camera in our laptops? |
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Busy Hands Make Happy Hands ...
Quote:
|
Look At The Shiny Object ...
Quote:
The goaltending violation was the shiny object that distracted me. Nice thread Blindolbat. Thanks. |
Quote:
|
Not Picking "Note" ...
Quote:
Quote:
Now, back to that shiny object. |
See also 4.19.6A
|
Another Citation ...
Quote:
RULING: In (a), both the violation and the foul are penalized. The basket interference by B2 causes the ball to become dead immediately. The violation is penalized by awarding the two points. The player-control foul on A1 is also charged. Team B is awarded the ball for a throw-in anywhere along the end line. A defensive-goaltending or basket-interference violation committed prior to a player-control foul does not contradict the general statement that when a player-control foul occurs that player cannot score. In the case of a defensive violation, it is the violation which results in awarding the score. In (b), the ball becomes dead and the try ends immediately when the player-control foul on A1 occurs. The action of B2 is ignored as goaltending cannot occur after the try has ended. The ball is awarded to Team B for a throw-in from a designated spot out of bounds closest to where the foul occurred. (4-12-1, 6-7-4, 6-7-9 EXCEPTION, 7-5-4a, 9-11) |
Doesn't Have To Be A Try ...
Quote:
What if (b) had been a basket interference (doesn't have to be a try) situation? Same ruling with a different rationale? |
How do you have an airborne shooter if there's no try?
Are you just trying to extend this thread because it's come to a conclusion? Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Quote:
NFHS made the specific case be goaltending, but it's not restrictive. |
Apples And Oranges. ...
Quote:
In situation (b), let's say that there was basket interference instead of goaltending, making the rationale of "the try ended" a moot point, the need for it to be a try to call goaltending is gone, with basket interference it can be a try, or not be a try. I would think that the ruling would be the same, no basket, but for a different reason, the foul makes the ball dead, and one can't have basket interference with a dead ball up on the ring, or in the cylinder. I just thought it odd that the NFHS didn't keep the basket interference situation for both (a) before the foul, and (b) after the foul, allowing us to compare apples to apples instead of forcing us to compare apples to oranges. |
Player Control Foul ...
Quote:
RULING: In (a), both the violation and the foul are penalized. The basket interference by B2 causes the ball to become dead immediately. The violation is penalized by awarding the two points. The player-control foul on A1 is also charged. Team B is awarded the ball for a throw-in anywhere along the end line. A defensive-goaltending or basket-interference violation committed prior to a player-control foul does not contradict the general statement that when a player-control foul occurs that player cannot score. In the case of a defensive violation, it is the violation which results in awarding the score. In (b), the ball becomes dead and the try ends immediately when the player-control foul on A1 occurs. The action of B2 is ignored as goaltending cannot occur after the try has ended. The ball is awarded to Team B for a throw-in from a designated spot out of bounds closest to where the foul occurred. (4-12-1, 6-7-4, 6-7-9 EXCEPTION, 7-5-4a, 9-11) |
I have no idea what you're trying to say. Like I said, this thread is over because what should have been common knowledge to veteran officials has been documented with the proper citations. You are searching for things that I can't even decipher.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Different Rationale ...
I'm now referring to the new caseplay, 4.19.6.A, brought to our attention by BigCat.
Quote:
I say same ruling, no basket, with a different rationale, one can't have basket interference with a dead ball up on the ring, or in the cylinder. The original situation (b) with goaltending had a rationale that one couldn't have goaltending because it was no longer a try (a necessary component of goaltending). |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28am. |