![]() |
Ball does not pass thru net
I know this has been discussed but I can not find the post(s)
(a) Ball passes thru basket, gets caught in the net and pops out. (b) Ball passes thru basket, hits player head and pops out (c) ball passes basket and gets lodged in net Are the rulings different NFHS, NCAAW and NCAAM I am not talking about the James Harden dunk. That ball passes thru the net https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlAkIarPbzI |
Your statements are contradictory. It can't pass through the basket (which is the rim and net combined) and get stuck in the net. Perhaps you meant "enters the basket".
Assuming so.... (a) no goal, play on (b) basket interference, count/cancel depending on offense/defense (c) goal is scored |
Not saying that you are incorrect however I have seen a handful of situations like play b and not one was called BI. They were all simply play on.
|
Quote:
|
Is there a specific case play or rule with wording describing this? There are descriptions of hands being allowed to do that in the act of dunking. Heads aren't?:p
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Contact With The Ball Continues ...
Quote:
contact with the ball, it is not a violation if such contact (touches the ball) with the ball continues after it enters the imaginary cylinder or if in such action, the player touches the basket. Dunking or stuffing is legal and is not basket interference. |
Quote:
If yes, then why isn't BI called more often when the dunker makes contact, with the arms or other body part, with the ball while it is in the net? If no, then why is BI suggested (Cameron/Nevada) when it hits the dunker's head as the ball is in the net? |
Purpose And Intent ...
Quote:
That's the best I got. Maybe others can offer more? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
4-6-1: “Basket interference occurs when a player:...Touches the ball or any part of the basket (including the net) while the ball is on or within either basket.” Does the action you describe meet the conditions of this rule? All you have to do is read the plain language of the rule and apply it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
NFHS BASKETBALL 2010-11 POINTS OF EMPHASIS 1. RULES ENFORCEMENT. There appears to be continued movement away from consistent enforcement of NFHS playing rules. Personal interpretations of the rules by individual officials have a negative impact on the game. The rules are written to provide a balance between offense and defense, minimize risk to participants, promote the sound tradition of the game and promote fair play. Individual philosophies and deviations from the rules as they are written and interpreted by the NFHS, negatively impact the basic tenets and fundamentals of the game. Illegal tactics that are permitted – are promoted. When officials allow players to use illegal tactics without penalty, the behavior is condoned and consequently encouraged. When officials consistently enforce the playing rules as intended, players and coaches are able to make the proper adjustments – promoting skill development and a level playing field. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19am. |