Goaltending, Then Foul on Airborne Shooter
Watching Vandy @ FL this evening. Saw a play that wasn’t called this way, but made me wonder what the ruling would have been if it had:
A1 shoots a floater from the middle of the paint with his momentum toward the basket. B1 leaps high and commits goaltending (C has whistle), and while B1’s momentum is going toward A1, B1 then comes into airborne shooter A1’s landing area. L has a whistle for a foul on airborne shooter A1 by B1 a split second after C’s whistle for GT).
Officials get together to discuss. What should they rule? For NFHS, closest case I could find is 6.7.9., but that has to do with a shooting foul first and then a BI violation. This is the other way around.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|