![]() |
Cincinnati-Memphis Verticality and T
Can someone post the sequence at 3:31 in the second half where a Memphis defender walls up and then the Cincinnati coach gets whacked during a Memphis fastbreak?
Looked like a great no-call to me and of course Bilas thought it was a foul. I would have preferred to see the T withheld until the transition play was over, however. |
Here is the play (Video)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/q_mz2jnXCAE" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Peace |
"Video Unavailable. This video is private."
|
So the defender was vertical until after the offense made contact but then he reaches with the right hand and arm forward to block the shot -- may have made contact with the arm and if he did at that point I have that as a foul. Pretty good verticality until he moves his hand and arm to block -- and that movement wasn't a product of the offensive players contact. You see it really will in the slo-mo #55 is who I reference.
|
Quote:
Peace |
Different Sense ...
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm going to give the defender the benefit of the doubt on this one. I have seen players that are much worse if a defender is trying to block a shot at the last minute like in this play. I think it is a solid no call. Peace |
Quote:
|
I see the defender swinging his arm down on his own volition, not from the initial contact.
|
I've got a foul here too. Same reasons as others. Great d until he attempted to meet the ball and missed
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43am. |