![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Arrow to B. After a try by A1, A5 dunks the ball on a rebound/put-back. An official calls BI on the offense (A) and cancels the basket. Upon review, the BI is overturned. Since the BI call made the ball dead at the time of the suspected infraction, and there is no mention of now counting the goal doesn't seem to be counted.. B gets the ball due to the AP arrow. If the goal was to be counted, why would you go to the arrow? That doesn't seem at all just. A loses the points and the ball or A gets the points and might get the ball (if they have the arrow). While there was clearly a need for a change, I don't think this is quite right. Similarly, it is not just for a defender grabbing a rebound that is called for BI and it isn't. The defender obtained possession. It shouldn't go to the arrow when there is immediate possession that was believed to be BI/GT.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2019-20 NFHS Rules Changes | SC Official | Basketball | 93 | Wed Dec 11, 2019 03:37pm |
| 2019 Rules Changes | kenref1 | Football | 69 | Sun Jun 09, 2019 10:20pm |
| 2019 NIT experimental rules | Nevadaref | Basketball | 6 | Fri Mar 22, 2019 02:30pm |
| 2019-2020 POE's | bas2456 | Basketball | 32 | Sat Feb 09, 2019 08:12pm |
| FED Rules Changes for 2019 | CT1 | Baseball | 3 | Mon Jul 09, 2018 11:26am |