The Official Forum
Page 2 of 5 1 2 34 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Gonzaga-Tech Vid. Req. (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/104506-gonzaga-tech-vid-req.html)

tjones1 Sat Mar 30, 2019 07:52pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 1031807)
Nope, fouled the thrower. This should be an intentional personal foul, not a technical.
Or F1 by NCAA rules.
Agree - thought it should of been an F1.

They said they called it a T which is why anyone was allowed to shoot the free throws.

I don't agree with the ruling.

Raymond Sat Mar 30, 2019 07:54pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuelrider (Post 1031816)
I'll tell you how it happens. If you watch closely trail and lead are both ball watching. Elite 8 this stuff just can't happen. I don't know the Perkins even touched him. 11.5 seconds to go Zach Norvell put back. TT defender in the RA No foul?
Touched whom? On the throw-in? Obvious hit to the left forearm.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

tjones1 Sat Mar 30, 2019 07:56pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by IUgrad92 (Post 1031817)
So are you saying this was a tough call? :confused::confused:

Maybe my expectations of a FF ref are too high... :rolleyes:
Mistakes happen. Higgins is one of the top officials in the game.

I thought it looked like he was blocked out by another player.

SC Official Sat Mar 30, 2019 07:56pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 (Post 1031818)
Agree - thought it should of been an F1.

They said they called it a T which is why anyone was allowed to shoot the free throws.

I don't agree with the ruling.
I couldn’t watch the game and haven’t seen the play, but if they ruled it a technical for touching the ball, it’s a Class B which is only one FT.

grunewar Sat Mar 30, 2019 07:57pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by IUgrad92 (Post 1031817)
So are you saying this was a tough call? :confused::confused:

Maybe my expectations of a FF ref are too high... :rolleyes:
No, I'm not saying it was a tough call. I'm saying, as it happened on the TV at the time, I said to my son that he was out of bounds. The camera angle from my living room was excellent! The call should have been made. It wasn't.

tjones1 Sat Mar 30, 2019 08:01pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 1031821)
I couldn’t watch the game and haven’t seen the play, but if they ruled it a technical for touching the ball, it’s a Class B which is only one FT.
That wasn't the ruling - TT shot two free throws.

JRutledge Sat Mar 30, 2019 08:01pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 (Post 1031820)
Mistakes happen. Higgins is one of the top officials in the game.

I thought it looked like he was blocked out by another player.
That is exactly what I was thinking and very possible.

Look we need to act like mistakes cannot happen. They happen but on this stage, these are more pronounced.

Peace

Nevadaref Sat Mar 30, 2019 08:27pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 (Post 1031820)
Mistakes happen. Higgins is one of the top officials in the game.

I thought it looked like he was blocked out by another player.
Agree. The original shooter is probably blocking his view.

Nevadaref Sat Mar 30, 2019 08:31pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 (Post 1031818)
Agree - thought it should of been an F1.

They said they called it a T which is why anyone was allowed to shoot the free throws.

I don't agree with the ruling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 1031821)
I couldn’t watch the game and haven’t seen the play, but if they ruled it a technical for touching the ball, it’s a Class B which is only one FT.
They reviewed it and said that it was an F1. However, they then either forgot that the inbounder has to attempt the FTs or had the wrong player as the thrower.

Note: this would be the second time in the tourney that a wrong FT shooter gets Higgins. He was the alternate a couple of years ago when the crew put the wrong shooter at the line. They all failed to advance.

Bad Zebra Sat Mar 30, 2019 08:34pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 (Post 1031818)
Agree - thought it should of been an F1.

They said they called it a T which is why anyone was allowed to shoot the free throws.

I don't agree with the ruling.
Do we definitively what it was called? F1 or T?

JRutledge Sat Mar 30, 2019 08:57pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad Zebra (Post 1031828)
Do we definitively what it was called? F1 or T?
A technical was actually called. It was said so by on the broadcast after the game and apparently, that came from JD Collins according to Steretore.

Peace

Bad Zebra Sat Mar 30, 2019 09:15pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 1031829)
A technical was actually called. It was said so by on the broadcast after the game and apparently, that came from JD Collins according to Steretore.

Peace
That’s what I thought...then why was it inbounded at the spot of the foul? Is that the NCAA rule or did they err at the inbound spot? That confused me.

SC Official Sat Mar 30, 2019 09:19pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad Zebra (Post 1031831)
That’s what I thought...then why was it inbounded at the spot of the foul? Is that the NCAA rule or did they err at the inbound spot? That confused me.
The spot of the foul and the POI are the exact same in this situation. Only dead ball contact and flagrant 2 T’s go to the division line.

SC Official Sat Mar 30, 2019 09:20pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 1031829)
A technical was actually called. It was said so by on the broadcast after the game and apparently, that came from JD Collins according to Steretore.

Peace
Then they erred in giving two FTs.

AremRed Sat Mar 30, 2019 10:11pm
They either erred giving two shots for a Class B or a Flagrant 1 with the wrong shooter. I didn’t see any of the refs come over to the table and explain — does anyone know if they did?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35am.
Page 2 of 5 1 2 34 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1