Papa's Got A Brand New Bag (James Brown, 1965) ...
There's a new twist on our local board this coming season. We can request from our assignment commissioner that we only get assigned boys games, only girls games, or both. No promises, he'll do the best he can to accommodate our requests.
In the past, we've had a few guys, older, with some orthopedic problems, "unofficially" request, and be granted, only girls games (does that mean girls get officials skewed toward the older, and slower (and maybe fatter, and out of shape) end of the spectrum). I'm wondering if this is an off shoot from our big change last year. Previous to last year, if our guys made both the boys and girls state tournament list (coaches vote), they could work both genders. Last year, if they made both lists, they had to chose only one gender, allowing some of our up and coming guys to work the tournament, those guys who, in previous years, would be sitting out the tournament (probably added about a dozen local guys to work state tournament games). Of course, this also meant that some of our "best" officials wouldn't work the gender they they didn't select. This was a highly contentious issue that made for some interesting, and very long meetings. The "new way" was the way that all the other five local Connecticut IAABO boards had been working state tournament games, we had been an outlier for many, many years. I guess that this means that we'll get some guys who want to be regular season "specialists", boys specialists, or girl specialists, hoping to get enough one gender coach votes to make the tournament list. The more girls games you work, the more votes your likely to get, and the same for boys. Maybe some female officials will want to only work girls games, providing role models for girls that may want to try officiating as adults (my daughter played basketball for about six years at a very high level and only saw one female official in all of those games). Not personally, but in general, for the good of the cause, I have mixed feelings about choosing boys or girls for the regular season, and about being forced to chose boys or girls for the for the state tournament. It's always nice to get choices. It may be nice to get some new blood in the state tournament. But is there any chance that the girls will end up getting short changed (not getting the best officials) for the regular season, and/or the state tournament? In have two daughters who played sports in high school, one of those in college, I'm a modern Title IX feminist type of guy, and something about this, I can't quite put my finger on it, bothers me? I'm probably looking at this more from the female student athlete's side, rather than the official's side. What would Gloria Steinem say? Should I be allowed to request only games with mostly black players? Or mostly white players? Only at big schools? Only at small schools? Not out in farm country? Only at Catholic schools? Not at Catholic schools? Not at deaf schools? Don't all of these kids deserve the best officials available at that date and time? Should mostly white officials be assigned to mostly white games? Should mostly black officials be assigned to mostly black games? Should mostly Catholic officials be assigned to Catholic school games? Should mostly female officials be assigned to girls games? Again, don't all of these kids deserve the best officials available at that date and time, regardless of the gender of the players, or the officials? I find this issue to be quite confusing, I'm fighting with myself, I can't put it all into words (though I certainly tried), and it gives me a headache thinking about it. https://tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.g...=0&w=300&h=300 |
Quote:
What would be interesting is if a female official were to request only boys games. |
The Plot Thickens ...
Quote:
Thanks for reading my lengthy post. I probably can't disagree with anyone's opinion because I can clearly see both sides of this issue, from the standpoint of a student athlete, and from the standpoint of an official, from the "choice is good" side, and from the "best official" gets the game side. Quote:
What happens when some principals (many female), athletic directors (many female), and coaches of girls teams (both male, and female) find out that some of our best officials can't be assigned to their girls games because some of the best officials have opted out of working girls regular season games? What happens when some boys coaches who voted for a great officials (who worked both genders regular season) find out that some great officials aren't working the boys state tournament because these great officials were forced to pick a gender and decided to work girls tournament games (maybe with the hope of advancing to higher rounds)? |
I can prove that the girls games get worse officiating in my area. The association gives all officials a rating. Let's say those numbers are 1-5 with 1 being the best.
It is a simple process to compare the quality of officiating on the games. Take the ratings of the officials and sum them. The lower the total, the better that the crew rates. If after doing the math, the boys crews average 5.2 and girls crews average 6.3, we have quantitatively demonstrated that worse officials are being provided for the girls contests. |
When I saw the title of this thread being posted from by an "associate" of mine from CT where I (because I am from Youngstown, Ohio) have a number of "friends", I thought it was about large officiating bags which can be very useful for other activities. :p
MTD, Sr. |
Watch Out For The Black Helicopters ...
Quote:
What if your school principals see this? What if your school athletic directors see this? What if coaches of your girls teams see this? What if girl players in your area see this? What if the parents of girls players in your area see this? Some of them may be attorneys. What if someone for the American Civil Liberties Union sees this? What if a Title IX coordinator sees this? And worse, what if Gloria Steinem sees this? Do you really want to deal with a former Playboy bunny? http://www.fototime.com/C7453E1F98544B8/standard.jpg I hope that your real name isn't Nevadaref, and that you really don't live in Nevada. Even then, they'll still find you. Right after they find the high level White House official that wrote that anonymous op-ed piece in the New York Times. They'll find him, and they'll find you. Watch out for the black helicopters. |
I am so happy I don't have to put up with this nonsense in Illinois. If I had to work girls games, I would never have started officiating high school basketball. It is pretty obvious in the Chicago area that the overall quality of girls officials is significantly lower than the boys officials. Most of the men doing high school girls games in this area are doing them because they were not good enough to get boys games or a full schedule of boys games.
And who cares what the principals, athletic directors, coaches, or Gloria Steinem thinks. As an independent contractor, I get to choose for whom and when I work. If they want better officials, they should make their product better. |
Potato Blight ...
Quote:
|
Quote:
I always thought that you were a "friend" of Whitey Bulger and moved from MA to CT to look after his "business" interests, :p. MTD, Sr. |
Good For The Game ...
Quote:
|
Magically Delicious ...
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Not In Connecticut, No Such Animal ...
Quote:
So, let me think, the boys get the "tired" officials? Parents of girls have to rush home from work to see the game, but parents of boys can just leisurely drive home, get a bite, maybe a "slice", and go to the game? |
Quote:
I don't have to put my hand out. People just know to bring me my "slice". But I do miss the good old days when "whacking" some meant something other than giving a HC a TF! LOL! MTD, Sr. |
Sometimes ...
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12pm. |