The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Contact above the shoulders (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/103439-contact-above-shoulders.html)

johnsonboys03 Tue Jan 30, 2018 02:29pm

Contact above the shoulders
 
Why can I not find the rule on contact to the head? I believe it was a 2013 NFHS change that said contact with an elbow in motion is to be ruled an intentional foul. Contact with an elbow with excessive movement should be ruled flagrant.

HokiePaul Tue Jan 30, 2018 02:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnsonboys03 (Post 1015945)
Why can I not find the rule on contact to the head? I believe it was a 2013 NFHS change that said contact with an elbow in motion is to be ruled an intentional foul. Contact with an elbow with excessive movement should be ruled flagrant.

If I remember correctly, this was a POE (case play interpretation) -- not an actual change in the rule.

SC Official Tue Jan 30, 2018 02:44pm

Discussed ad nauseam on this forum.

johnsonboys03 Tue Jan 30, 2018 04:47pm

I can't find an archive of this anywhere either. Has this emphasis changed. I'm failing to find the rule anywhere in current books.

HokiePaul Tue Jan 30, 2018 05:13pm

It's not in any of the current books. I'm not sure when the language dropped out, but (at least in my area) it has been accepted that the interpretation remains valid.

If asked, I would state something like: "Coach, NHFS has emphasized that an elbow in motion making contact with an opponent in an Intentional Foul"

2012-13 POINTS OF EMPHASIS
2. Contact above the shoulders. With a continued emphasis on reducing concussions and decreasing excessive contact situations the committee determined that more guidance is needed for penalizing contact above the shoulders.
a. A player shall not swing his/her arm(s) or elbow(s) even without contacting an opponent. Excessive swinging of the elbows occurs when arms and elbows are swung about while using the shoulders as pivots, and the speed of the extended arms and elbows is in excess of the rest of the body as it rotates on the hips or on the pivot foot. Currently it is a violation in Rule 9 Section 13 Article.
b. Examples of illegal contact above the shoulders and resulting penalties.
1. Contact with a stationary elbow may be incidental or a common foul.
2. An elbow in movement but not excessive should be an intentional foul.
3. A moving elbow that is excessive can be either an intentional foul or flagrant personal foul.

johnsonboys03 Tue Jan 30, 2018 08:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by HokiePaul (Post 1015959)
It's not in any of the current books. I'm not sure when the language dropped out, but (at least in my area) it has been accepted that the interpretation remains valid.

If asked, I would state something like: "Coach, NHFS has emphasized that an elbow in motion making contact with an opponent in an Intentional Foul"

2012-13 POINTS OF EMPHASIS
2. Contact above the shoulders. With a continued emphasis on reducing concussions and decreasing excessive contact situations the committee determined that more guidance is needed for penalizing contact above the shoulders.
a. A player shall not swing his/her arm(s) or elbow(s) even without contacting an opponent. Excessive swinging of the elbows occurs when arms and elbows are swung about while using the shoulders as pivots, and the speed of the extended arms and elbows is in excess of the rest of the body as it rotates on the hips or on the pivot foot. Currently it is a violation in Rule 9 Section 13 Article.
b. Examples of illegal contact above the shoulders and resulting penalties.
1. Contact with a stationary elbow may be incidental or a common foul.
2. An elbow in movement but not excessive should be an intentional foul.
3. A moving elbow that is excessive can be either an intentional foul or flagrant personal foul.

Am I the only one that thinks this is crazy to not abe a written rule in the rule book, if this is what they want called? I try really hard to ALWAYS quote the actual rule when teaching on something at our chapter meetings. This is a topic people wanted to talk about, and not having a rule reference is making that difficult.

Thanks for the archived P. O. E however😀

HokiePaul Wed Jan 31, 2018 10:09am

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnsonboys03 (Post 1015967)
Am I the only one that thinks this is crazy to not abe a written rule in the rule book, if this is what they want called? I try really hard to ALWAYS quote the actual rule when teaching on something at our chapter meetings. This is a topic people wanted to talk about, and not having a rule reference is making that difficult.

Thanks for the archived P. O. E however😀

This has been discussed here before -- Most agree with you that this should have been put into the rules. That said, it isn't in conflict with the rule. If you prefer to cite the Intentional Foul rule, you can still do that by saying something like "Coach, I saw an elbow in motion contact the opponent above the shoulders which I ruled to be excessive contact" I doubt this is one that most coaches are going to argue.

BigCat Wed Jan 31, 2018 02:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by HokiePaul (Post 1015983)
This has been discussed here before -- Most agree with you that this should have been put into the rules. That said, it isn't in conflict with the rule. If you prefer to cite the Intentional Foul rule, you can still do that by saying something like "Coach, I saw an elbow in motion contact the opponent above the shoulders which I ruled to be excessive contact" I doubt this is one that most coaches are going to argue.

It is my number one issue with NFHS. Never made it to rule book. The POE says contact with elbow "in movement" above shoulders is an intentional foul...at very least. If it is "excessive" it is Flagrant and player tossed. Any elbow moving and contact made-intentional at least...
If you want me to call it that way I need to see it in a rule so someone else can see why I did so....😞

BillyMac Wed Jan 31, 2018 04:10pm

Swingers ...
 
https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1634/...32ceb38a_b.jpg

sdoebler Wed Jan 31, 2018 04:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 1016007)

Isn't swinging faster than the torso but without making contact still a violation?

bob jenkins Wed Jan 31, 2018 05:02pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdoebler (Post 1016013)
Isn't swinging faster than the torso but without making contact still a violation?

First line of the second half of the chart.

sdoebler Wed Jan 31, 2018 05:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 1016014)
First line of the second half of the chart.

I guess it just seems contradictory to the first line a bit, but I guess that is segregating fouls and violations.

bob jenkins Thu Feb 01, 2018 08:52am

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdoebler (Post 1016015)
I guess it just seems contradictory to the first line a bit, but I guess that is segregating fouls and violations.

The very first line is "no excessive swinging" -- so it's clearly NOT going to be a violation or anything flagrant.

The first line of the second part is "excessive swinging" -- so both of those are in play.

Ther's no contradiction (there is some question as to whether NFHS / your state still wants it enforced this way), but the cart was accurate based on the POE

Amesman Thu Feb 01, 2018 09:42pm

Truly a nice chart, Craig (via Billy).

But if someone swings an elbow above a defender's head, that's not going to be an intentional or flagrant PF in my games.

Now if an elbow is swung into/onto an opponent's head or above the shoulders ...

Welpe Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amesman (Post 1016158)

But if someone swings an elbow above a defender's head, that's not going to be an intentional or flagrant PF in my games.

Who is advocating for that?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1