Quote:
If the situation is such that a Team is allowed to request a TO, then the Game Official must grant the request. MTD, Sr. |
Quote:
(And for the life of me I can't figure out why a realistic reason a coach would do that anyway . . .maybe the star is still having a cut wrapped up?) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ok, how about this sitch:
Tie game. 2.3 seconds left. Team A inbounding bedding to go the length of the floor to score. Team B steals the inbounds pass just outside the 3 point line and turns to shoot. B1 is fouled in the act of shooting a three point shot as time expires. Team A still has 3 time outs. Is there any reason Team A couldn’t call a timeout before the first free throw is attempted, and then if that is missed, call another one before the second FT, and if that misses, take another timeout before the final FT. I had that in a game yesterday, just without the timeouts mixed in. Player misses the first two before making the third to win the game. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The definition of successive timeout is clear. |
Quote:
|
Either Team ...
Quote:
Just to be clear: In a tied game, with both teams having multiple timeouts still available, with Team A in the double bonus, A1 is fouled so close to the end of the fourth period that the buzzer subsequently sounds and the clock shows 0:00:00. Officials meet and decide that while the foul occurred barely before the buzzer, nobody has any definite knowledge regarding how much time was on the clock when the foul occurred. As the officials are moving into position to allow A1 free throws with the lane cleared, Team A requests and is granted a sixty second time out. After the timeout, A1 misses the first of two free throws. Team B now requests a sixty second timeout. The officials deny Team B's timeout request because the rule states that successive timeouts may not be granted to either team. Right? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You would be wrong. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Look at 5.11.7, both situations. |
Let's Go To The Videotape ...
Quote:
The horn then sounds ending the fourth quarter playing time. The ball continues its flight and goes through the basket to tie the score. Before A1 attempts the free throw as part of the fourth quarter, Team B captain requests and is granted a 60- second time-out. Team A or B captain then requests a 30-second time-out during the same dead-ball period. RULING: The second request is denied. At the end of playing time for the fourth quarter or any overtime period, successive time-outs shall not be granted. This means a time-out cannot be granted either team until the clock has run in the extra period – assuming the free throw is missed. Successive time-outs may be granted in all situations except after time has expired in the fourth quarter or any extra period. 5.11.7 SITUATION B: Following the expiration of time for the first extra period, the coach of Team B is charged with a technical foul. Team B requests a time-out before the free throws are administered to start the second extra period. The time-out request is granted. Thereafter, the official administers the first free throw to A1. Following the attempt: (a) Team B; or (b) Team A, then requests a time-out. RULING: The request cannot be granted in either (a) or (b), as it would be consid - ered a successive time-out. The fact that the ball did become live between the two requests has no bearing on the ruling. Another time-out request by either team cannot be honored until after the clock has started in the second extra period. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13pm. |