Originally Posted by bucky (Post 1007473)

Why wouldn't this be an automatic technical foul on the screaming coach? Although no one mentioned it and it wasn't the exact topic, it certainly can feel good to wack a coach...when he is correct. Just because a coach is correct does not give him/her the right to act that way, especially directly in front of the kids.:cool:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 1007487)

Automatic??

To each his or her own, but I am not giving a T just because a coach gets emotional. That is kind of what they do and I would be giving Ts all the time if that was the case.

Not many Ts are automatic and certainly not this situation. Not unless you want to not work very much.

Peace

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 1007487)

a coach gets emotional.

Peace

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 1007492)

I don't let players scream at opposing coaches and I'm not letting coaches scream at opposing players, either. I'm addressing it, for certain.

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 1007530)

Letting someone do something and giving a T are not always the same thing. I do not let players or coaches do a lot of things and I never give a T for it or have to. And I am wondering if this situation was really that dramatic or just a conflict over something silly.

Peace

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 1007531)

And "addressing" something doesn't always mean giving a T.

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 1007532)

That is why I do not have to give many Ts in the first place. I address things and they do not happen again.