![]() |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
On the held-ball play, I think that meets the definition and was a good call. Otherwise, it would have been a travel, but I think Anderson got it right.
On the PC play, we have a closed look on both the original view and the replay view. Anderson had the perfect view of any potential elbow that potentially displaced Thornwell. On the verticality play, I think the defender played that perfectly and I would not have had a whistle. On the team control/shot clock play, obviously TC did not change and the shot clock should not have been reset, and eventually was properly left at 23 after a hiccup reset (and another looooonnngggg review). |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Really tough call in real time, though. Given the relative motion of the two players involved, I can certainly see how it may have appeared to the L that the defender was moving forward. That happens when the offensive player has a lot of downhill momentum and the contact is significant. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Having two feet down while not in the path (where he started) is not enough to establish LGP. The defender must get two feet on the floor while facing AND in the path. While the defender wasn't moving forward, what isn't clear from the video is whether the defender got that 2nd foot down to establish LGP once he got in the path of the opponent. From the angle provided, I can't say whether he did or didn't. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32am. |