3 or 2 point shot?

[Nevadaref]

Yes, now look at the shooter's feet.
What I'm interested in from this play is the crew communication.
During the next possession by blue the game is stopped and the new T consults with the C about the try instead of the official who was Trail. I found that strange.
How could the crew have done better to get this play right?

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Am I looking at the right play? I see a three point shot that puts the team in white ahead.

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Yes, now look at the shooter's feet.

Am I looking at the same video as everybody else at 1:33:49? Between the camera angle, the lights reflecting off the floor, and players getting in the way, I can't clearly see the three point line, nor the player's feet.

[JRutledge]

This must be the play.

I did not see this play based on the original time stamp given. I was looking at a different time of the game.



Peace

[BigCat]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

This must be the play.

I did not see this play based on the original time stamp given. I was looking at a different time of the game.



Peace

Yes, this has to be it. Clearly a two that is signaled a 3. Some good points in it by the official/assignor/whomever talking about it.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by BigCat

Some good points ...

An additional point for the good of the cause. Since the official signals a three, and the scorer adds three to the scorebook, this can be a correctable error (not a bookkeeping error) situation and doesn't have to corrected immediately. It can be corrected within the parameters of the correctable error rule (erroneously counting or canceling a score, if error is made while the clock is running and the ball dead, it must be recognized by an official before the second live ball, if an error is corrected, play shall be resumed from the point of interruption to rectify the error).

[BigCat]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

An additional point for the good of the cause. Since the official signals a three, and the scorer adds three to the scorebook, this can be a correctable error (not a bookkeeping error) situation and doesn't have to corrected immediately. It can be corrected within the parameters of the correctable error rule (erroneously counting or canceling a score, if error is made while the clock is running and the ball dead, it must be recognized by an official before the second live ball, if an error is corrected, play shall be resumed from the point of interruption to rectify the error).

It IS a correctable error...made while clock running. It MUST be corrected before second live ball.

[ODog]

No later than during the first dead ball after the clock has properly started. Minor but important distinction.

You could have a second live ball, and a third, and a fourth, and so on, and still be within the CE window.

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

An additional point for the good of the cause. Since the official signals a three, and the scorer adds three to the scorebook, this can be a correctable error (not a bookkeeping error) situation and doesn't have to corrected immediately.

A bookkeeping error doesn't have to be corrected immediately, either.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by SC Official

A bookkeeping error doesn't have to be corrected immediately, either.

It doesn't, but, as I stated, this is not a bookkeeping error that can be "corrected" until the jurisdiction of the officials ends (leave the visual confines of the court). As a correctable error, it doesn't have to be corrected immediately, but unlike a bookkeeping error, there is a much smaller window for correction.